DBMS > Apache Phoenix vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. OpenQM vs. Valentina Server

System Properties Comparison Apache Phoenix vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. OpenQM vs. Valentina Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Apache Phoenix  Xexclude from comparison	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	OpenQM also called QM  Xexclude from comparison	Valentina Server  Xexclude from comparison
		This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	A scale-out RDBMS with evolutionary schema built on Apache HBase	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	QpenQM is a high-performance, self-tuning, multi-value DBMS	Object-relational database and reports server
Primary database model	Relational DBMS	Document store Key-value store	Multivalue DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 2.06 Rank #123   Overall #58   Relational DBMS		Score 0.34 Rank #284   Overall #10   Multivalue DBMS	Score 0.21 Rank #325   Overall #144   Relational DBMS
Website	phoenix.apache.org	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.rocketsoftware.com/­products/­rocket-multivalue-application-development-platform/­rocket-open-qm	www.valentina-db.net
Technical documentation	phoenix.apache.org			valentina-db.com/­docs/­dokuwiki/­v5/­doku.php
Developer	Apache Software Foundation	Atos Convergence Creators	Rocket Software, originally Martin Phillips	Paradigma Software
Initial release	2014	2016	1993	1999
Current release	5.0-HBase2, July 2018 and 4.15-HBase1, December 2019	1703	3.4-12	5.7.5
License Commercial or Open Source	Open Source Apache Version 2.0	commercial	Open Source GPLv2, extended commercial license available	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java
Server operating systems	Linux Unix Windows	Linux	AIX FreeBSD Linux macOS Raspberry Pi Solaris Windows	Linux OS X Windows
Data scheme	yes late-bound, schema-on-read capabilities	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes with some exceptions	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes	optional		yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	yes	yes
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	yes	no	no	yes
APIs and other access methods	JDBC	LDAP		ODBC
Supported programming languages	C C# C++ Go Groovy Java PHP Python Scala	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net Basic C Java Objective C PHP Python	.Net C C# C++ Objective-C PHP Ruby Visual Basic Visual Basic.NET
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	user defined functions	no	yes	yes
Triggers	no	yes	yes	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding	Sharding cell division	yes
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication	yes	yes
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	Hadoop integration		no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	ACID	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes		yes
User concepts Access control	Access Control Lists (using HBase ACL) for RBAC, integration with Apache Ranger for RBAC & ABAC, multi-tenancy	LDAP bind authentication	Access rights can be defined down to the item level	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Apache Phoenix	Atos Standard Common Repository	OpenQM also called QM	Valentina Server
DB-Engines blog posts	Cloudera's HBase PaaS offering now supports Complex Transactions 11 August 2021,  Krishna Maheshwari (sponsor)  show all
Recent citations in the news	Supercharge SQL on Your Data in Apache HBase with Apache Phoenix | Amazon Web Services 2 June 2016, AWS Blog Azure #HDInsight Apache Phoenix now supports Zeppelin 16 August 2018, Microsoft Bridge the SQL-NoSQL gap with Apache Phoenix 4 February 2016, InfoWorld Apache Calcite, FreeMarker, Gora, Phoenix, and Solr updated 27 March 2017, SDTimes.com Azure HDInsight Analytics Platform Now Supports Apache Hadoop 3.0 18 April 2019, eWeek provided by Google News			A Look at Valentina — SitePoint 18 April 2014, SitePoint MySQL GUI Tools for Windows and Ubuntu/Linux: Top 8 free or open source 7 December 2018, H2S Media provided by Google News

Share this page