DBMS > Apache Jena - TDB vs. Percona Server for MySQL vs. Postgres-XL vs. STSdb

System Properties Comparison Apache Jena - TDB vs. Percona Server for MySQL vs. Postgres-XL vs. STSdb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A RDF storage and query DBMS, shipped as an optional-use component of the Apache Jena framework

Enhanced drop-in replacement for MySQL based on XtraDB or TokuDB storage engines with improved performance and additional diagnostic and management features.

Based on PostgreSQL enhanced with MPP and write-scale-out cluster features

Key-Value Store with special method for indexing

optimized for high performance using a special indexing method

Primary database model

RDF store

Relational DBMS

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Document store
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	3.85
Rank	#86	Overall
	#3	RDF stores

Score	2.21
Rank	#121	Overall
	#58	Relational DBMS

Score	0.52
Rank	#256	Overall
	#117	Relational DBMS

Score	0.06
Rank	#365	Overall
	#55	Key-value stores

Website

jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/index.html

www.percona.com/software/mysql-database/percona-server

www.postgres-xl.org

github.com/STSSoft/STSdb4

Technical documentation

jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/index.html

www.percona.com/downloads/Percona-Server-LATEST

www.postgres-xl.org/documentation

Developer

Apache Software Foundation

originally developed by HP Labs

Percona

STS Soft SC

Initial release

2000

2008

2014

since 2012, originally named StormDB

2011

Current release

4.9.0, July 2023

8.0.36-28, 2024

10 R1, October 2018

4.0.8, September 2015

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache License, Version 2.0

Open Source

GPL version 2

Open Source

Mozilla public license

Open Source

GPLv2, commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C and C++

Server operating systems

All OS with a Java VM

Linux

Linux
macOS

Windows

Data scheme

yes

RDF Schemas

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

primitive types and user defined types (classes)

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

XML type, but no XML query functionality

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

distributed, parallel query execution

APIs and other access methods

Fuseki

REST-style SPARQL HTTP Interface
Jena RDF API
RIO

RDF Input/Output

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

ADO.NET
JDBC
native C library
ODBC
streaming API for large objects

.NET Client API

Supported programming languages

Java

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

.Net
C
C++
Delphi
Erlang
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl

C#
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

user defined functions

Triggers

yes

via event handler

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

horizontal partitioning

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication
XtraDB Cluster

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

TDB Transactions

ACID

MVCC

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access control via Jena Security

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

no user groups or roles

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Sparql Secrets In Jena-Fuseki - DataScienceCentral.com
24 July 2022, Data Science Central

A catalogue with semantic annotations makes multilabel datasets FAIR | Scientific Reports
4 May 2022, Nature.com

Are there any Ontology Deployment Framework that can process OWL semantics and allow reasoning?
17 April 2018, ResearchGate

MarkLogic Hones Its Triple Store
18 August 2015, Datanami

Comparing Grakn to Semantic Web Technologies — Part 1/3 | by Tomas Sabat
26 June 2020, Towards Data Science

provided by Google News

Update or migrate? Planning for MySQL 5.7 EOL
22 June 2023, InfoWorld

If you don't brush and floss, you're gonna get an abscess – same with MySQL updates
11 May 2023, The Register

Sizing Up Servers: Intel's Skylake-SP Xeon versus AMD's EPYC 7000 - The Server CPU Battle of the Decade?
11 July 2017, AnandTech

How to deploy the Percona database performance monitor with Docker
24 February 2023, TechRepublic

ScaleFlux computational storage makes Percona MySQL faster – Blocks and Files
5 August 2020, Blocks & Files

provided by Google News

Share this page