DBMS > Apache Impala vs. Snowflake vs. Teradata

System Properties Comparison Apache Impala vs. Snowflake vs. Teradata

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Analytic DBMS for Hadoop

Cloud-based data warehousing service for structured and semi-structured data

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	11.22
Rank	#41	Overall
	#25	Relational DBMS

Score	168.09
Rank	#6	Overall
	#5	Relational DBMS

Score	34.08
Rank	#22	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Website

impala.apache.org

www.snowflake.com

www.teradata.com

Technical documentation

impala.apache.org/impala-docs.html

docs.snowflake.net/manuals/index.html

docs.teradata.com

Developer

Apache Software Foundation

Apache top-level project, originally developed by Cloudera

Snowflake Computing Inc.

Teradata

Initial release

2013

2014

1984

Current release

4.1.0, June 2022

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Server operating systems

Linux

hosted

hosted
Linux

Data scheme

yes

support of semi-structured data formats (JSON, XML, Avro)

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like DML and DDL statements

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC

CLI Client
JDBC
ODBC

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

Supported programming languages

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC

JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

user defined functions and integration of map-reduce

user defined functions

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

similar concept for controling cloud resources

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

yes

Sharding

Hashing

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

query execution via MapReduce

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users, groups and roles

based on Apache Sentry and Kerberos

Users with fine-grained authorization concept, user roles and pluggable authentication

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Snowflake is the Database Management System of the Year 2024
16 January 2025, Tom Russell

Snowflake is the DBMS of the Year 2022, defending the title from last year
3 January 2023, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

Snowflake is the DBMS of the Year 2021
3 January 2022, Paul Andlinger, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Apache Impala becomes Top-Level Project
28 November 2017, SD Times

Hudi: Uber Engineering’s Incremental Processing Framework on Apache Hadoop
12 March 2017, Uber

Cloudera brings Apache Iceberg data lake format to its Data Platform
30 June 2022, SiliconANGLE

Apache Doris just ‘graduated’: Why care about this SQL data warehouse
24 June 2022, InfoWorld

Apache Iceberg Changes Everything: What's Underneath?
28 August 2023, Spiceworks

provided by Google News

EDF Builds an Intelligent Customer Engine on the Snowflake Data Cloud
11 April 2025, Snowflake

Snowflake for Applications & Collaboration | AI Data Cloud
17 February 2025, Snowflake

Snowflake for Data Lakes
17 February 2025, Snowflake

Snowflake Unistore
10 April 2025, Snowflake

provided by Google News

Is Teradata (TDC) Stock Undervalued Right Now?
24 April 2025, Yahoo Finance

Teradata Announces 2025 First Quarter Earnings Release Date
23 April 2025, Business Wire

Guggenheim Capital LLC Lowers Stock Position in Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC)
24 April 2025, MarketBeat

Teradata Corp. (TDC) Appoints Sumeet Arora as Chief Product Officer
22 April 2025, StreetInsider

Breaking Down Teradata: 5 Analysts Share Their Views
21 April 2025, Benzinga

provided by Google News

Share this page