DBMS > Apache Doris vs. OrigoDB vs. Sequoiadb vs. Teradata

System Properties Comparison Apache Doris vs. OrigoDB vs. Sequoiadb vs. Teradata

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

An MPP-based analytics DBMS embracing the MySQL protocol

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

NewSQL database with distributed OLTP and SQL

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Document store
Relational DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.57
Rank	#244	Overall
	#113	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#383	Overall
	#53	Document stores
	#20	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.45
Rank	#261	Overall
	#41	Document stores
	#122	Relational DBMS

Score	45.33
Rank	#21	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Website

doris.apache.org
github.com/apache/doris

origodb.com

www.sequoiadb.com

www.teradata.com

Technical documentation

github.com/apache/doris/wiki

origodb.com/docs

www.sequoiadb.com/en/index.php?m=Files&a=index

docs.teradata.com

Developer

Apache Software Foundation, originally contributed from Baidu

Robert Friberg et al

Sequoiadb Ltd.

Teradata

Initial release

2017

2009

under the name LiveDB

2013

1984

Current release

1.2.2, February 2023

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

Server: AGPL; Client: Apache V2

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux
Windows

Linux

hosted
Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

yes

oid, date, timestamp, binary, regex

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
MySQL client

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

proprietary protocol using JSON

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

Supported programming languages

Java

.Net

.Net
C++
Java
PHP
Python

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

yes

JavaScript

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Sharding

Hashing

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

depending on model

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Document is locked during a transaction

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Role based authorization

simple password-based access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Migrating from ClickHouse to Apache Doris: Boosting OLAP Performance
9 October 2023, hackernoon.com

How to Digest 15 Billion Logs Per Day and Keep Big Queries Within 1 Second
1 September 2023, KDnuggets

LLM-Powered OLAP: the Tencent Experience with Apache Doris
28 August 2023, hackernoon.com

Apache Doris just 'graduated': Why care about this SQL data warehouse
24 June 2022, InfoWorld

Apache Doris Analytical Database Graduates from Apache Incubator
20 June 2022, Datanami

provided by Google News

Why Teradata (TDC) Shares Are Plunging Today
7 May 2024, Yahoo Finance

Kenvue, Crocs rise; Disney, Teradata fall, Tuesday, 5/7/2024
7 May 2024, ABC News

The Analyst Landscape: 9 Takes On Teradata - Teradata (NYSE:TDC)
7 May 2024, Benzinga

Teradata's stock tumbles after BofA cuts rating on lack of near-term positive catalysts
7 May 2024, Seeking Alpha

Teradata (TDC) Q1 Earnings and Revenues Beat Estimates
6 May 2024, Yahoo Finance

provided by Google News

Share this page