DBMS > RavenDB vs. TiDB vs. XTDB

System Properties Comparison RavenDB vs. TiDB vs. XTDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Open Source Operational and Transactional Enterprise NoSQL Document Database

TiDB is an open source distributed SQL database that supports Hybrid Transactional/Analytical Processing (HTAP) workloads. It is MySQL compatible and features horizontal scalability, strong consistency, and high availability.

A general purpose database with bitemporal SQL and Datalog and graph queries

Primary database model

Document store

Relational DBMS

Document store

Secondary database models

Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

Document store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	2.59
Rank	#95	Overall
	#17	Document stores

Score	3.58
Rank	#73	Overall
	#38	Relational DBMS

Score	0.20
Rank	#314	Overall
	#46	Document stores

Website

ravendb.net

pingcap.com

github.com/xtdb/xtdb
www.xtdb.com

Technical documentation

ravendb.net/docs

docs.pingcap.com/tidb/stable

www.xtdb.com/docs

Developer

Hibernating Rhinos

PingCAP, Inc.

Juxt Ltd.

Initial release

2010

2016

2019

Current release

5.4, July 2022

8.2.0, July 2024

1.19, September 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

AGPL version 3, commercial license available

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

MIT License

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Go, Rust

Clojure

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS
Raspberry Pi
Windows

Linux

All OS with a Java 8 (and higher) VM
Linux

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

yes, extensible-data-notation format

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language (RQL)

yes

limited SQL, making use of Apache Calcite

APIs and other access methods

.NET Client API
F# Client API
Go Client API
Java Client API
NodeJS Client API
PHP Client API
Python Client API
RESTful HTTP API

GORM
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary protocol
SQLAlchemy

HTTP REST
JDBC

Supported programming languages

.Net
C#
F#
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

Clojure
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

horizontal partitioning (by key range)

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication

Using Raft consensus algorithm to ensure data replication with strong consistency among multiple replicas.

yes, each node contains all data

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

with TiSpark Connector

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Default ACID transactions on the local node (eventually consistent across the cluster). Atomic operations with cluster-wide ACID transactions. Eventual consistency for indexes and full-text search indexes.

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

full support since version 6.6

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID, Cluster-wide transaction available

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, flexibel persistency by using storage technologies like Apache Kafka, RocksDB or LMDB

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

Authorization levels configured per client per database

Fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

RavenDB Welcomes David Baruc as Chief Revenue Officer: Seasoned Tech Leader to Drive Global Sales and Accelerate Growth
13 June 2023, PR Newswire

Interview with RavenDB Founder Oren Eini
31 August 2020, infoq.com

Install the NoSQL RavenDB Data System
14 May 2021, The New Stack

Get To Know: Oren Eini, CEO, RavenDB
22 October 2019, Intelligent CIO

RavenDB Launches Version 6.0 Lightning Fast Queries, Data Integrations, Corax Indexing Engine, and Sharding
2 October 2023, PR Newswire

provided by Google News

PingCAP Unveils Major TiDB Enhancements to Power Global Scale and AI-Driven Applications
22 April 2025, GlobeNewswire

How TiDB User Day India 2025 Sparked Conversations on the Future of Databases
5 May 2025, CXOToday.com

Build a data lakehouse in a hybrid Environment using Amazon EMR Serverless, Apache DolphinScheduler, and TiDB
20 March 2025, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

How TiDB is solving enterprise data challenges with scalability and speed
21 March 2025, YourStory.com

The future of databases in India: TiDB’s answer to modern data challenges
21 March 2025, ET CIO

provided by Google News

Share this page