DBMS > Infobright vs. JanusGraph vs. ReductStore vs. TigerGraph

System Properties Comparison Infobright vs. JanusGraph vs. ReductStore vs. TigerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend

A Graph DBMS optimized for distributed clusters

It was forked from the latest code base of Titan in January 2017

Designed to manage unstructured time-series data efficiently, providing unique features such as storing time-stamped blobs with labels, customizable data retention policies, and a straightforward FIFO quota system.

A complete, distributed, parallel graph computing platform supporting web-scale data analytics in real-time

Primary database model

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.86
Rank	#201	Overall
	#96	Relational DBMS

Score	1.78
Rank	#131	Overall
	#12	Graph DBMS

Score	0.01
Rank	#379	Overall
	#39	Time Series DBMS

Score	1.40
Rank	#152	Overall
	#14	Graph DBMS

Website

ignitetech.com/softwarelibrary/infobrightdb

janusgraph.org

github.com/reductstore
www.reduct.store

www.tigergraph.com

Technical documentation

docs.janusgraph.org

www.reduct.store/docs

docs.tigergraph.com

Developer

Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.

Linux Foundation; originally developed as Titan by Aurelius

ReductStore LLC

Initial release

2005

2017

2023

2017

Current release

1.0.0, October 2023

1.9, March 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

Business Source License 1.1

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++, Rust

C++

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Linux
OS X
Unix
Windows

Docker
Linux
macOS
Windows

Linux

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

Knowledge Grid Technology used instead

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language (GSQL)

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

Java API
TinkerPop Blueprints
TinkerPop Frames
TinkerPop Gremlin
TinkerPop Rexster

HTTP API

GSQL (TigerGraph Query Language)
Kafka
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

Clojure
Java
Python

C++
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Rust

C++
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

yes

depending on the used storage backend (e.g. Cassandra, HBase, BerkeleyDB)

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

via Faunus, a graph analytics engine

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

yes

Relationships in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Supports various storage backends: Cassandra, HBase, Berkeley DB, Akiban, Hazelcast

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities

User authentification and security via Rexster Graph Server

Role-based access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Simple Deployment of a Graph Database: JanusGraph
12 October 2020, Towards Data Science

JanusGraph Picks Up Where TitanDB Left Off
13 January 2017, Datanami

Open source Microsoft Graph Engine takes on Neo4j
13 February 2017, InfoWorld

The year of the graph: Getting graphic, going native, reshaping the landscape
8 January 2018, ZDNet

Third Time Is The Charm For Nebula Graph Database
19 January 2021, The Next Platform

provided by Google News

TigerGraph unveils GenAI assistant, introduces new CEO
30 April 2024, TechTarget

Exploring the Power of Graph with Tigergraph
31 October 2024, AWS Blog

How TigerGraph CoPilot enables graph-augmented AI
30 April 2024, InfoWorld

TigerGraph raises $105M Series C for its enterprise graph database
17 February 2021, TechCrunch

An Introduction to Using TigerGraph with Go: Exploring COVID-19 Patient Cases
22 May 2022, Towards Data Science

provided by Google News

Share this page