DBMS > ITTIA vs. openGemini vs. OrigoDB vs. SpatiaLite vs. VoltDB

System Properties Comparison ITTIA vs. openGemini vs. OrigoDB vs. SpatiaLite vs. VoltDB

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Edge Time Series DBMS with Real-Time Stream Processing

An open source distributed Time Series DBMS with high concurrency, high performance, and high scalability

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Spatial extension of SQLite

Distributed In-Memory NewSQL RDBMS

Used for OLTP applications with a high frequency of relatively simple transactions, that can hold all their data in memory

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Spatial DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.44
Rank	#267	Overall
	#23	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.09
Rank	#361	Overall
	#37	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.06
Rank	#380	Overall
	#50	Document stores
	#18	Object oriented DBMS

Score	1.63
Rank	#146	Overall
	#3	Spatial DBMS

Score	1.47
Rank	#157	Overall
	#73	Relational DBMS

Website

www.ittia.com

www.opengemini.org
github.com/openGemini

origodb.com

www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/index

www.voltdb.com

Technical documentation

docs.opengemini.org/guide

origodb.com/docs

www.gaia-gis.it/gaia-sins/spatialite_topics.html

docs.voltdb.com

Developer

ITTIA L.L.C.

Huawei and openGemini community

Robert Friberg et al

Alessandro Furieri

VoltDB Inc.

Initial release

2007

2022

2009

under the name LiveDB

2008

2010

Current release

8.7

1.1, July 2023

5.0.0, August 2020

11.3, April 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

MPL 1.1, GPL v2.0 or LGPL v2.1

Open Source

AGPL for Community Edition, commercial license for Enterprise, AWS, and Pro Editions

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

C++

Java, C++

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

server-less

Linux
OS X

for development

Data scheme

Fixed schema

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

Float/Blob/Integer/String/Unicode/Date/Time/Timestamp/Interval

Integer, Float, Boolean, String

User defined using .NET types and collections

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language

yes

only a subset of SQL 99

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API
WebSocket

HTTP REST

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Java API
JDBC
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

Supported programming languages

C
C++
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

C
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Rust

.Net

C#
C++
Erlang

not officially supported
Go
Java
JavaScript

Node.js
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Java

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

none

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

none

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

depending on model

yes

FOREIGN KEY constraints are not supported

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

ACID

Transactions are executed single-threaded within stored procedures

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

yes

Data access is serialized by the server

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

yes

Snapshots and command logging

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Database file passwords

Administrators and common users accounts

Role based authorization

Users and roles with access to stored procedures

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Spatial database management systems
6 April 2021, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

Embedded secured data base for STM32 MCUs
16 October 2023, Electronics Weekly

ITTIA Embedded Time Series Database to Support STM32 Edge Devices
8 April 2022, Embedded Computing Design

ITTIA Launches Edge Data Processing & Management Database for Microcontrollers, MCUs
9 April 2022, Embedded Computing Design

Free Healthcare Data for Use with Maptitude 2019 Mapping Software
20 September 2019, GISuser.com

provided by Google News

About HUAWEI Open Source
9 February 2022, huawei.com

provided by Google News

VoltDB Launches Active(N) Lossless Cross Data Center Replication
31 August 2021, PR Newswire

VoltDB Upgrades Power, Security of Its In-Memory Database
1 February 2017, eWeek

VoltDB Aims for Fast Big Data Development -- ADTmag
29 January 2015, ADT Magazine

VoltDB Adds Geospatial Support, Cross-Site Replication
28 January 2016, The New Stack

Stonebraker Seeks to Invert the Computing Paradigm with DBOS
12 March 2024, Datanami

provided by Google News

Share this page