DBMS > IBM Db2 Event Store vs. InfinityDB vs. RDFox vs. ToroDB

System Properties Comparison IBM Db2 Event Store vs. InfinityDB vs. RDFox vs. ToroDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

ToroDB seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.

Description

Distributed Event Store optimized for Internet of Things use cases

A Java embedded Key-Value Store which extends the Java Map interface

High performance knowledge graph and semantic reasoning engine

A MongoDB-compatible JSON document store, built on top of PostgreSQL

Primary database model

Event Store
Time Series DBMS

Key-value store

Graph DBMS
RDF store

Document store

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.18
Rank	#315	Overall
	#2	Event Stores
	#26	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#383	Overall
	#59	Key-value stores

Score	0.22
Rank	#305	Overall
	#25	Graph DBMS
	#15	RDF stores

Website

www.ibm.com/products/db2-event-store

boilerbay.com

www.oxfordsemantic.tech

github.com/torodb/server

Technical documentation

www.ibm.com/docs/en/db2-event-store

boilerbay.com/infinitydb/manual

docs.oxfordsemantic.tech

Developer

IBM

Boiler Bay Inc.

Oxford Semantic Technologies

8Kdata

Initial release

2017

2002

2017

2016

Current release

2.0

4.0

6.0, Septermber 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free developer edition available

commercial

Open Source

AGPL-V3

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

Java

C++

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux, macOS, Windows for the developer addition

All OS with a Java VM

Linux
macOS
Windows

All OS with a Java 7 VM

Data scheme

yes

nested virtual Java Maps, multi-value, logical â€˜tuple spaceâ€™ runtime Schema upgrade

yes

RDF schemas

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

all Java primitives, Date, CLOB, BLOB, huge sparse arrays

yes

string, integer, double, boolean, date, object_id

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

manual creation possible, using inversions based on multi-value capability

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

through the embedded Spark runtime

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
DB2 Connect
JDBC
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

Access via java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentNavigableMap Interface
Proprietary API to InfinityDB ItemSpace (boilerbay.com/docs/ItemSpaceDataStructures.htm)

RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL 1.1

Supported programming languages

C
C#
C++
Cobol
Delphi
Fortran
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Visual Basic

Java

C
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Active-active shard replication

none

replication via a shared file system

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

READ-COMMITTED or SERIALIZED

Immediate Consistency in stand-alone mode, Eventual Consistency in replicated setups

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

manual creation possible, using inversions based on multi-value capability

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Optimistic locking for transactions; no isolation for bulk loads

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

No - written data is immutable

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

Yes - Synchronous writes to local disk combined with replication and asynchronous writes in parquet format to permanent shared storage

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Roles, resources, and access types

Access rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Mudhakar Srivatsa
11 December 2023, IBM Research

Best cloud databases of 2022
4 October 2022, ITPro

IBM Confronts AI Resistance
23 October 2019, RTInsights

Why a robust data management strategy is essential today | IBM HDM
19 September 2019, Express Computer

How IBM Is Turning Db2 into an ‘AI Database’
3 June 2019, Datanami

provided by Google News

Samsung Electronics Announces Acquisition of Oxford Semantic Technologies, UK-Based Knowledge Graph Startup
18 July 2024, Samsung Global Newsroom

Samsung acquires UK-based knowledge graph company
19 July 2024, evertiq.com

University spin-out Oxford Semantic Technologies acquired by Samsung Electronics
16 July 2024, University of Oxford

Samsung eyes Oxford tech firm for innovative AI venture
20 July 2024, Oxford Mail

Use semantic reasoning to infer new facts from your RDF graph by integrating RDFox with Amazon Neptune
20 February 2023, AWS Blog

provided by Google News

Share this page