DBMS > Hyprcubd vs. JanusGraph vs. mSQL vs. OrigoDB vs. SurrealDB

System Properties Comparison Hyprcubd vs. JanusGraph vs. mSQL vs. OrigoDB vs. SurrealDB

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Hyprcubd seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Serverless Time Series DBMS

A Graph DBMS optimized for distributed clusters

It was forked from the latest code base of Titan in January 2017

mSQL (Mini SQL) is a simple and lightweight RDBMS

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

A fully ACID transactional, developer-friendly, multi-model DBMS

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Graph DBMS

Relational DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.78
Rank	#131	Overall
	#12	Graph DBMS

Score	1.27
Rank	#160	Overall
	#73	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#386	Overall
	#54	Document stores
	#20	Object oriented DBMS

Score	1.01
Rank	#181	Overall
	#30	Document stores
	#17	Graph DBMS

Website

hyprcubd.com (offline)

janusgraph.org

hughestech.com.au/products/msql

origodb.com

surrealdb.com

Technical documentation

docs.janusgraph.org

origodb.com/docs

surrealdb.com/docs

Developer

Hyprcubd, Inc.

Linux Foundation; originally developed as Titan by Aurelius

Hughes Technologies

Robert Friberg et al

SurrealDB Ltd

Initial release

2017

1994

2009

under the name LiveDB

2022

Current release

1.0.0, October 2023

4.4, October 2021

v1.5.0, May 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache 2.0

commercial

free licenses can be provided

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Rust

Server operating systems

hosted

Linux
OS X
Unix
Windows

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
OS X
Solaris SPARC/x86
Windows

Linux
Windows

Linux
macOS
Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

time, int, uint, float, string

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented

no subqueries, aggregate functions, views, foreign keys, triggers

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

gRPC (https)

Java API
TinkerPop Blueprints
TinkerPop Frames
TinkerPop Gremlin
TinkerPop Rexster

JDBC
ODBC

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

GraphQL
RESTful HTTP API
WebSocket

Supported programming languages

Clojure
Java
Python

C
C++
Delphi
Java
Perl
PHP
Tcl

.Net

Deno
Go
JavaScript (Node.js)
Rust

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

yes

depending on the used storage backend (e.g. Cassandra, HBase, BerkeleyDB)

none

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

none

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

via Faunus, a graph analytics engine

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Supports various storage backends: Cassandra, HBase, Berkeley DB, Akiban, Hazelcast

yes

Write ahead log

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

token access

User authentification and security via Rexster Graph Server

Role based authorization

yes, based on authentication and database rules

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Simple Deployment of a Graph Database: JanusGraph
12 October 2020, Towards Data Science

JanusGraph Picks Up Where TitanDB Left Off
13 January 2017, Datanami

Open source Microsoft Graph Engine takes on Neo4j
13 February 2017, InfoWorld

The year of the graph: Getting graphic, going native, reshaping the landscape
8 January 2018, ZDNet

Third Time Is The Charm For Nebula Graph Database
19 January 2021, The Next Platform

provided by Google News

SurrealDB Empowers Developers to Build Applications with the Launch of SurrealDB University
15 October 2024, Business Wire

SurrealDB is helping developers consolidate their databases
18 June 2024, TechCrunch

SurrealDB Delivers Future-Ready Database Technology for Developers and Enterprises with Release of SurrealDB 2.0
17 September 2024, Business Wire

Meet Tobie Morgan Hitchcock, CEO & Co-Founder Of SurrealDB
25 April 2024, TechRound

Data Management News for the Week of September 20; Updates from Alcion, DataOps.Live, Veeam & More
20 September 2024, Solutions Review

provided by Google News

Share this page