DBMS > Hawkular Metrics vs. Manticore Search vs. ObjectBox vs. Tkrzw

System Properties Comparison Hawkular Metrics vs. Manticore Search vs. ObjectBox vs. Tkrzw

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.

Multi-storage database for search, including full-text search.

Lightweight, fast on-device database for IoT, Mobile and Embedded devices, persisting and synchronising objects and vectors

A concept of libraries, allowing an application program to store and query key-value pairs in a file. Successor of Tokyo Cabinet and Kyoto Cabinet

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Search engine

Object oriented DBMS
Vector DBMS

Key-value store

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

using the Manticore Columnar Library

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.01
Rank	#377	Overall
	#39	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.23
Rank	#301	Overall
	#21	Search engines

Score	1.08
Rank	#179	Overall
	#6	Object oriented DBMS
	#9	Vector DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#385	Overall
	#61	Key-value stores

Website

www.hawkular.org

manticoresearch.com

github.com/objectbox
objectbox.io

dbmx.net/tkrzw

Technical documentation

www.hawkular.org/hawkular-metrics/docs/user-guide

manual.manticoresearch.com

docs.objectbox.io

Developer

Community supported by Red Hat

Manticore Software

ObjectBox Limited

Mikio Hirabayashi

Initial release

2014

2017

2020

Current release

6.0, February 2023

4.0 (May 2024)

0.9.3, August 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

GPL version 2

Bindings are released under Apache 2.0

Apache License 2.0

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

C and C++

C++

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Windows

Android
Any POSIX system
Docker
iOS
Linux
macOS
QNX
Windows

Linux
macOS

Data scheme

schema-free

Fixed schema

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

Int, Bigint, Float, Timestamp, Bit, Int array, Bigint array, JSON, Boolean

yes, plus "flex" map-like types

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Can index from XML

Secondary indexes

yes

full-text index on all search fields

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

HTTP REST

Binary API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
RESTful HTTP/SQL API
SQL over MySQL

Proprietary native API

Supported programming languages

Go
Java
Python
Ruby

Elixir
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python

C
C++
Dart (Flutter)
Go
Java
Kotlin
Python
Swift

C++
Java
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

Triggers

yes

via Hawkular Alerting

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

based on Cassandra

Sharding

Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor

based on Cassandra

Synchronous replication based on Galera library

Data sync between devices allowing occasional connected databases to work completely offline

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

based on Cassandra
Immediate Consistency

based on Cassandra

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

isolated transactions for atomic changes and binary logging for safe writes

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

The original contents of fields are not stored in the Manticore index.

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

using specific database classes

User concepts

Access control

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

News

MongoDB Realm & Device Sync alternatives – ObjectBox
17 September 2024

Local AI – what it is and why we need it
11 September 2024

First on-device Vector Database (aka Semantic Index) for iOS
24 July 2024

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) with vector databases: Expanding AI Capabilities
18 June 2024

The on-device Vector Database for Android and Java
29 May 2024

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived…
5 June 2019, DevClass

provided by Google News

Comparing Meilisearch and Manticore Search Using Key Benchmarks
2 May 2023, hackernoon.com

Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++
25 July 2022, hackernoon.com

Integrating Manticore Search with Apache Superset
8 August 2023, hackernoon.com

Highlighting in Search Results
24 May 2020, hackernoon.com

40 Stories To Learn About Elasticsearch
27 April 2023, hackernoon.com

provided by Google News

Share this page