DBMS > GeoMesa vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. HugeGraph vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

System Properties Comparison GeoMesa vs. Hawkular Metrics vs. HugeGraph vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	GeoMesa  Xexclude from comparison	Hawkular Metrics  Xexclude from comparison	HugeGraph  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS  Xexclude from comparison
				SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	GeoMesa is a distributed spatio-temporal DBMS based on various systems as storage layer.	Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.	A fast-speed and highly-scalable Graph DBMS	Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures
Primary database model	Spatial DBMS	Time Series DBMS	Graph DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 0.86 Rank #205   Overall #4   Spatial DBMS	Score 0.08 Rank #366   Overall #39   Time Series DBMS	Score 0.17 Rank #335   Overall #31   Graph DBMS
Website	www.geomesa.org	www.hawkular.org	github.com/­hugegraph hugegraph.apache.org	www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html
Technical documentation	www.geomesa.org/­documentation/­stable/­user/­index.html	www.hawkular.org/­hawkular-metrics/­docs/­user-guide	hugegraph.apache.org/­docs
Developer	CCRi and others	Community supported by Red Hat	Baidu	Sybase, SAP
Initial release	2014	2014	2018	1993
Current release	5.0.0, May 2024		0.9
License Commercial or Open Source	Open Source Apache License 2.0	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source Apache Version 2.0	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Scala	Java	Java
Server operating systems		Linux OS X Windows	Linux macOS Unix	Linux Windows
Data scheme	yes	schema-free	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	no	yes also supports composite index and range index	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	no	yes
APIs and other access methods		HTTP REST	Java API RESTful HTTP API TinkerPop Gremlin	.NET Client API ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB
Supported programming languages		Go Java Python Ruby	Groovy Java Python	Delphi Perl PHP
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	asynchronous Gremlin script jobs	yes
Triggers	no	yes via Hawkular Alerting	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	depending on storage layer	Sharding based on Cassandra	yes depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	depending on storage layer	selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	yes depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase	Multi-source replication CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	yes	no	via hugegraph-spark	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	depending on storage layer	Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra	Eventual Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes edges in graph	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	no	no	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	depending on storage layer	no	yes	no caching of (temporary) tables can be configured
User concepts Access control	yes depending on the DBMS used for storage	no	Users, roles and permissions	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	GeoMesa	Hawkular Metrics	HugeGraph	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS
DB-Engines blog posts	Spatial database management systems 6 April 2021, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news		Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived… • DEVCLASS 5 June 2019, DevClass provided by Google News	POC exploit code published for 9.8-rated Apache HugeGraph RCE flaw 7 June 2024, The Register PoC Exploit Released for High Severity Apache HugeGraph RCE flaw 7 June 2024, CybersecurityNews AI, Lockbit, Veeam, Club Penguin, Kali, Commando Cat, HugeGraph, Aaran Leyland… – SWN #391 7 June 2024, SC Media Critical Apache HugeGraph Flaw Let Attackers Execute Remote Code 23 April 2024, GBHackers Microsoft's Recall criticized for security shortcomings. Cyberespionage in Ukraine. 11 June 2024, The CyberWire provided by Google News	SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View 19 October 2023, SAP News provided by Google News

Share this page