DBMS > EsgynDB vs. Lovefield vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

System Properties Comparison EsgynDB vs. Lovefield vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	EsgynDB  Xexclude from comparison	Lovefield  Xexclude from comparison	Microsoft Azure Table Storage  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS  Xexclude from comparison
				SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Enterprise-class SQL-on-Hadoop solution, powered by Apache Trafodion	Embeddable relational database for web apps written in pure JavaScript	A Wide Column Store for rapid development using massive semi-structured datasets	Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures
Primary database model	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Wide column store	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 0.25 Rank #312   Overall #138   Relational DBMS	Score 0.33 Rank #286   Overall #131   Relational DBMS	Score 4.04 Rank #77   Overall #6   Wide column stores
Website	www.esgyn.cn	google.github.io/­lovefield	azure.microsoft.com/­en-us/­services/­storage/­tables	www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html
Technical documentation		github.com/­google/­lovefield/­blob/­master/­docs/­spec_index.md
Developer	Esgyn	Google	Microsoft	Sybase, SAP
Initial release	2015	2014	2012	1993
Current release		2.1.12, February 2017
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	yes	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	C++, Java	JavaScript
Server operating systems	Linux	server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js) tested with Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari	hosted	Linux Windows
Data scheme	yes	yes	schema-free	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	yes	SQL-like query language via JavaScript builder pattern	no	yes
APIs and other access methods	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC		RESTful HTTP API	.NET Client API ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB
Supported programming languages	All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC/ADO.Net	JavaScript	.Net C# C++ Java JavaScript (Node.js) PHP Python Ruby	Delphi Perl PHP
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	Java Stored Procedures	no	no	yes
Triggers	no	Using read-only observers	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding	none	Sharding Implicit feature of the cloud service	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	Multi-source replication between multi datacenters	none	yes implicit feature of the cloud service. Replication either local, cross-facility or geo-redundant.	Multi-source replication CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	yes	no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency		Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	yes	yes	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	ACID	ACID	optimistic locking	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes, by using IndexedDB or the cloud service Firebase Realtime Database	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	no	yes using MemoryDB	no	no caching of (temporary) tables can be configured
User concepts Access control	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	no	Access rights based on private key authentication or shared access signatures	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	EsgynDB	Lovefield	Microsoft Azure Table Storage	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS
Recent citations in the news			Working with Azure to Use and Manage Data Lakes 7 March 2024, Simplilearn How to Use C# Azure.Data.Tables SDK with Azure Cosmos DB 9 July 2021, hackernoon.com How to use Azure Table storage in .Net 14 January 2019, InfoWorld Quick Guide to Azure Storage Pricing 16 May 2023, DevOps.com How to write data to Azure Table Store with an Azure Function 14 April 2017, Experts Exchange provided by Google News	SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View 19 October 2023, SAP News provided by Google News

Share this page