DBMS > EXASOL vs. OpenEdge vs. OpenMLDB vs. Snowflake

System Properties Comparison EXASOL vs. OpenEdge vs. OpenMLDB vs. Snowflake

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

High-performance, in-memory, MPP database specifically designed for in-memory analytics.

Application development environment with integrated database management system

An open-source machine learning database that provides a feature platform for training and inference

Cloud-based data warehousing service for structured and semi-structured data

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.66
Rank	#138	Overall
	#64	Relational DBMS

Score	3.69
Rank	#78	Overall
	#42	Relational DBMS

Score	0.11
Rank	#339	Overall
	#30	Time Series DBMS

Score	133.72
Rank	#7	Overall
	#5	Relational DBMS

Website

www.exasol.com

www.progress.com/openedge

openmldb.ai

www.snowflake.com

Technical documentation

www.exasol.com/resources

documentation.progress.com/output/ua/OpenEdge_latest

openmldb.ai/docs/zh/main

docs.snowflake.net/manuals/index.html

Developer

Exasol

Progress Software Corporation

4 Paradigm Inc.

Snowflake Computing Inc.

Initial release

2000

1984

2020

2014

Current release

OpenEdge 12.2, March 2020

2024-2 February 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++, Java, Scala

Server operating systems

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
Solaris
Windows

Linux

hosted

Data scheme

yes

Fixed schema

yes

support of semi-structured data formats (JSON, XML, Avro)

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

close to SQL 92

yes

APIs and other access methods

.Net
JDBC
ODBC
WebSocket

JDBC
ODBC

JDBC
SQLAlchemy

CLI Client
JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

Java
Lua
Python
R

Progress proprietary ABL (Advanced Business Language)

C++
Go
Java
Python
Scala

JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

yes

user defined functions

Triggers

yes

similar concept for controling cloud resources

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

since Version 11.4

horizontal partitioning

yes

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Hadoop integration

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users, groups and roles according to SQL-standard

Users and groups

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Users with fine-grained authorization concept, user roles and pluggable authentication

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.