DBMS > Dolt vs. IBM Db2 Event Store vs. Infobright vs. SiteWhere

System Properties Comparison Dolt vs. IBM Db2 Event Store vs. Infobright vs. SiteWhere

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A MySQL compatible DBMS with Git-like versioning of data and schema

Distributed Event Store optimized for Internet of Things use cases

High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend

M2M integration platform for persisting/querying time series data

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Event Store
Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.93
Rank	#194	Overall
	#90	Relational DBMS

Score	0.18
Rank	#315	Overall
	#2	Event Stores
	#26	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.88
Rank	#198	Overall
	#92	Relational DBMS

Score	0.07
Rank	#347	Overall
	#33	Time Series DBMS

Website

github.com/dolthub/dolt
www.dolthub.com

www.ibm.com/products/db2-event-store

ignitetech.com/softwarelibrary/infobrightdb

github.com/sitewhere/sitewhere

Technical documentation

docs.dolthub.com

www.ibm.com/docs/en/db2-event-store

sitewhere1.sitewhere.io/index.html

Developer

DoltHub Inc

IBM

Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.

SiteWhere

Initial release

2018

2017

2005

2010

Current release

2.0

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

free developer edition available

commercial

The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016

Open Source

Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS
Windows

Linux

Linux, macOS, Windows for the developer addition

Linux
Windows

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

yes

predefined scheme

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

Knowledge Grid Technology used instead

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

through the embedded Spark runtime

yes

APIs and other access methods

CLI Client
HTTP REST

ADO.NET
DB2 Connect
JDBC
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

HTTP REST

Supported programming languages

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

C
C#
C++
Cobol
Delphi
Fortran
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Visual Basic

.Net
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

currently in alpha release

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

none

Sharding

based on HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

A database can be cloned to multiple locations and be used there in isolation. Data/schema changes can be pushed/pulled explicitly between locations.

Active-active shard replication

Source-replica replication

selectable replication factor

based on HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

No - written data is immutable

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Yes - Synchronous writes to local disk combined with replication and asynchronous writes in parquet format to permanent shared storage

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Only one user is configurable, and must be specified in the config file at startup

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Dolt- A Version Controlled Database
29 January 2024, iProgrammer

Dolt, a Relational Database with Git-Like Cloning Features
19 August 2020, The New Stack

Data Versioning at Scale: Chaos and Chaos Management
10 February 2023, InfoQ.com

Top Data Version Control Tools for Machine Learning Research in 2023
24 July 2023, MarkTechPost

Radar trends to watch: September 2020
1 September 2020, O'Reilly Media

provided by Google News

Mudhakar Srivatsa
11 December 2023, IBM Research

Best cloud databases of 2022
4 October 2022, ITPro

IBM Confronts AI Resistance
23 October 2019, RTInsights

Why a robust data management strategy is essential today | IBM HDM
19 September 2019, Express Computer

How IBM Is Turning Db2 into an ‘AI Database’
3 June 2019, Datanami

provided by Google News

SiteWhere: An open platform for connected devices
11 July 2017, Open Source For You

Top Open-Source Tools for IoT Development in 2024
5 September 2024, Analytics Insight

11 Best Open source IoT Platforms To Develop Smart Projects
9 March 2023, H2S Media

provided by Google News

Share this page