DBMS > Dolt vs. Hyprcubd vs. mSQL vs. OpenMLDB vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison Dolt vs. Hyprcubd vs. mSQL vs. OpenMLDB vs. OrigoDB

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Hyprcubd seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

A MySQL compatible DBMS with Git-like versioning of data and schema

Serverless Time Series DBMS

mSQL (Mini SQL) is a simple and lightweight RDBMS

An open-source machine learning database that provides a feature platform for training and inference

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Primary database model

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.96
Rank	#193	Overall
	#90	Relational DBMS

Score	1.27
Rank	#167	Overall
	#77	Relational DBMS

Score	0.02
Rank	#367	Overall
	#37	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#383	Overall
	#53	Document stores
	#20	Object oriented DBMS

Website

github.com/dolthub/dolt
www.dolthub.com

hyprcubd.com (offline)

hughestech.com.au/products/msql

openmldb.ai

origodb.com

Technical documentation

docs.dolthub.com

openmldb.ai/docs/zh/main

origodb.com/docs

Developer

DoltHub Inc

Hyprcubd, Inc.

Hughes Technologies

4 Paradigm Inc.

Robert Friberg et al

Initial release

2018

1994

2020

2009

under the name LiveDB

Current release

4.4, October 2021

2024-2 February 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

free licenses can be provided

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++, Java, Scala

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS
Windows

hosted

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
OS X
Solaris SPARC/x86
Windows

Linux

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Fixed schema

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

time, int, uint, float, string

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language

A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented

no subqueries, aggregate functions, views, foreign keys, triggers

yes

APIs and other access methods

CLI Client
HTTP REST

gRPC (https)

JDBC
ODBC

JDBC
SQLAlchemy

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Supported programming languages

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

C
C++
Delphi
Java
Perl
PHP
Tcl

C++
Go
Java
Python
Scala

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

currently in alpha release

yes

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

A database can be cloned to multiple locations and be used there in isolation. Data/schema changes can be pushed/pulled explicitly between locations.

none

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

none

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Only one user is configurable, and must be specified in the config file at startup

token access

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Role based authorization

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Top Data Version Control Tools for Machine Learning Research in 2023
24 July 2023, MarkTechPost

Dolt, a Relational Database with Git-Like Cloning Features
19 August 2020, The New Stack

Data Versioning at Scale: Chaos and Chaos Management
10 February 2023, InfoQ.com

Radar Trends to Watch: July 2022 – O'Reilly
5 July 2022, oreilly.com

Are you still not using Version Control for Data?
11 April 2020, Towards Data Science

provided by Google News

Higher Education PS rules out ghost students before PAC
29 November 2018, diggers.news

provided by Google News

MLOp practice: using OpenMLDB in the real-time anti-fraud model for the bank's online transaction
23 August 2021, Towards Data Science

Predictive maintenance — 5minutes demo of an end to end machine learning project
13 August 2021, Towards Data Science

Compared to Native Spark 3.0, We Have Achieved Significant Optimization Effects in the AI
3 August 2021, Towards Data Science

provided by Google News

Share this page