DBMS > DataFS vs. Manticore Search vs. OpenMLDB vs. Sequoiadb

System Properties Comparison DataFS vs. Manticore Search vs. OpenMLDB vs. Sequoiadb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

All data is stored inside objects which are linked by so-called link attributes. Objects consist of classes which can be extended and de-extended at runtime. Graphs can be defined with a struct.

Multi-storage database for search, including full-text search.

An open-source machine learning database that provides a feature platform for training and inference

NewSQL database with distributed OLTP and SQL

Primary database model

Object oriented DBMS

Search engine

Time Series DBMS

Document store
Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Graph DBMS

Time Series DBMS

using the Manticore Columnar Library

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.09
Rank	#360	Overall
	#17	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.29
Rank	#302	Overall
	#21	Search engines

Score	0.10
Rank	#359	Overall
	#36	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.50
Rank	#258	Overall
	#41	Document stores
	#120	Relational DBMS

Website

Technical documentation

dev.mobiland.com/Overview.xsp

manual.manticoresearch.com

openmldb.ai/docs/zh/main

www.sequoiadb.com/en/index.php?m=Files&a=index

Developer

Mobiland AG

Manticore Software

4 Paradigm Inc.

Sequoiadb Ltd.

Initial release

2018

2017

2020

2013

Current release

1.1.263, October 2022

6.0, February 2023

2024-2 February 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

GPL version 2

Open Source

Server: AGPL; Client: Apache V2

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

C++, Java, Scala

C++

Server operating systems

Windows

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Windows

Linux

Data scheme

Classes, Structs, and Lists are written in proprietary DataTypeDefinitionLanguage (.dtdl) and Objects consisting of those are written in proprietary DataAccessDefinitionLanguage (.dadl)

Fixed schema

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

Int, Bigint, Float, Timestamp, Bit, Int array, Bigint array, JSON, Boolean

yes

oid, date, timestamp, binary, regex

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Can index from XML

Secondary indexes

yes

full-text index on all search fields

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

yes

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

.NET Client API
Proprietary client DLL
WinRT client

Binary API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
RESTful HTTP/SQL API
SQL over MySQL

JDBC
SQLAlchemy

proprietary protocol using JSON

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
VB.Net

Elixir
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python

C++
Go
Java
Python
Scala

.Net
C++
Java
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

JavaScript

Triggers

no, except callback-events from server when changes happened

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Proprietary Sharding system

Sharding

Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported

horizontal partitioning

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Synchronous replication based on Galera library

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Eventual Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

yes

isolated transactions for atomic changes and binary logging for safe writes

Document is locked during a transaction

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

The original contents of fields are not stored in the Manticore index.

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Windows-Profile

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

simple password-based access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Integrating Manticore Search with Apache Superset
8 August 2023, hackernoon.com

Clickhouse vs Elasticsearch vs Manticore Search Query Times With a 1.7B NYC Taxi Rides Benchmark
1 June 2022, hackernoon.com

Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++
25 July 2022, hackernoon.com

8 Google Alternatives: How to Search Crypto, the Dark Web, More
1 February 2023, Gizmodo

Highlighting in Search Results
24 May 2020, hackernoon.com

provided by Google News

MLOp practice: using OpenMLDB in the real-time anti-fraud model for the bank's online transaction
23 August 2021, Towards Data Science

Predictive maintenance — 5minutes demo of an end to end machine learning project
13 August 2021, Towards Data Science

Compared to Native Spark 3.0, We Have Achieved Significant Optimization Effects in the AI
3 August 2021, Towards Data Science

provided by Google News

Share this page