DBMS > Bangdb vs. KairosDB vs. TigerGraph vs. Tkrzw vs. Yaacomo

System Properties Comparison Bangdb vs. KairosDB vs. TigerGraph vs. Tkrzw vs. Yaacomo

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Yaacomo seems to be discontinued and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking

Description

Converged and high performance database for device data, events, time series, document and graph

Distributed Time Series DBMS based on Cassandra or H2

A complete, distributed, parallel graph computing platform supporting web-scale data analytics in real-time

A concept of libraries, allowing an application program to store and query key-value pairs in a file. Successor of Tokyo Cabinet and Kyoto Cabinet

OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing

Primary database model

Document store
Graph DBMS
Time Series DBMS

Secondary database models

Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.07
Rank	#347	Overall
	#48	Document stores
	#36	Graph DBMS
	#31	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.57
Rank	#238	Overall
	#20	Time Series DBMS

Score	1.40
Rank	#152	Overall
	#14	Graph DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#386	Overall
	#61	Key-value stores

Website

bangdb.com

github.com/kairosdb/kairosdb

www.tigergraph.com

dbmx.net/tkrzw

yaacomo.com

Technical documentation

docs.bangdb.com

kairosdb.github.io

docs.tigergraph.com

Developer

Sachin Sinha, BangDB

Mikio Hirabayashi

Q2WEB GmbH

Initial release

2012

2013

2017

2020

2009

Current release

BangDB 2.0, October 2021

1.2.2, November 2018

0.9.3, August 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

BSD 3

Open Source

Apache 2.0

commercial

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, C++

Java

C++

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux

Linux
macOS

Android
Linux
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes: string, long, double, int, geospatial, stream, events

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

secondary, composite, nested, reverse, geospatial

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL like support with command line tool

SQL-like query language (GSQL)

yes

APIs and other access methods

Proprietary protocol
RESTful HTTP API

Graphite protocol
HTTP REST
Telnet API

GSQL (TigerGraph Query Language)
Kafka
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

C
C#
C++
Java
Python

Java
JavaScript

Node.js
PHP
Python

C++
Java

C++
Java
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes, Notifications (with Streaming only)

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding (enterprise version only). P2P based virtual network overlay with consistent hashing and chord algorithm

Sharding

based on Cassandra

none

horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor, Knob for CAP (enterprise version only)

selectable replication factor

based on Cassandra

none

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Tunable consistency, set CAP knob accordingly

Eventual Consistency

based on Cassandra
Immediate Consistency

based on Cassandra

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes, optimistic concurrency control

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes, implements WAL (Write ahead log) as well

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes, run db with in-memory only mode

yes

using specific database classes

yes

User concepts

Access control

yes (enterprise version only)

simple password-based access control

Role-based access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Real-Time Performance and Health Monitoring Using Netdata
2 September 2019, CNX Software

Fig. 3. Monitoring dashboard has a global overview of the energy...
8 September 2018, ResearchGate

provided by Google News

TigerGraph unveils GenAI assistant, introduces new CEO
30 April 2024, TechTarget

Exploring the Power of Graph with Tigergraph
31 October 2024, AWS Blog

How TigerGraph CoPilot enables graph-augmented AI
30 April 2024, InfoWorld

TigerGraph raises $105M Series C for its enterprise graph database
17 February 2021, TechCrunch

An Introduction to Using TigerGraph with Go: Exploring COVID-19 Patient Cases
22 May 2022, Towards Data Science

provided by Google News

Share this page