DBMS > Badger vs. Firebase Realtime Database vs. OrigoDB vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

System Properties Comparison Badger vs. Firebase Realtime Database vs. OrigoDB vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Badger  Xexclude from comparison	Firebase Realtime Database  Xexclude from comparison	OrigoDB  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS  Xexclude from comparison
				SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	An embeddable, persistent, simple and fast Key-Value Store, written purely in Go.	Cloud-hosted realtime document store. iOS, Android, and JavaScript clients share one Realtime Database instance and automatically receive updates with the newest data.	A fully ACID in-memory object graph database	Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures
Primary database model	Key-value store	Document store	Document store Object oriented DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 0.22 Rank #320   Overall #47   Key-value stores	Score 13.64 Rank #39   Overall #6   Document stores	Score 0.06 Rank #380   Overall #50   Document stores #18   Object oriented DBMS
Website	github.com/­dgraph-io/­badger	firebase.google.com/­products/­realtime-database	origodb.com	www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html
Technical documentation	godoc.org/­github.com/­dgraph-io/­badger	firebase.google.com/­docs/­database	origodb.com/­docs
Developer	DGraph Labs	Google acquired by Google 2014	Robert Friberg et al	Sybase, SAP
Initial release	2017	2012	2009 under the name LiveDB	1993
License Commercial or Open Source	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	Open Source	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	yes	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Go		C#
Server operating systems	BSD Linux OS X Solaris Windows	hosted	Linux Windows	Linux Windows
Data scheme	schema-free	schema-free	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	no	yes	User defined using .NET types and collections	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	no	no can be achieved using .NET	no
Secondary indexes	no	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	no	yes
APIs and other access methods		Android iOS JavaScript API RESTful HTTP API	.NET Client API HTTP API LINQ	.NET Client API ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB
Supported programming languages	Go	Java JavaScript Objective-C	.Net	Delphi Perl PHP
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	limited functionality with using 'rules'	yes	yes
Triggers	no	Callbacks are triggered when data changes	yes Domain Events	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	none		horizontal partitioning client side managed; servers are not synchronized	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	none		Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	no	no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	none	Eventual Consistency if the client is offline Immediate Consistency if the client is online		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	depending on model	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	no	yes	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes Write ahead log	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	no		yes	no caching of (temporary) tables can be configured
User concepts Access control	no	yes, based on authentication and database rules	Role based authorization	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Badger	Firebase Realtime Database	OrigoDB	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS
DB-Engines blog posts		Cloud-based DBMS's popularity grows at high rates 12 December 2019, Paul Andlinger show all
Recent citations in the news		Realtime vs Cloud Firestore: Which Firebase Database to go? 8 March 2024, Appinventiv Google launches Firebase Genkit, a new open source framework for building AI-powered apps 14 May 2024, TechCrunch Atos cybersecurity blog: Misconfigured Firebase: A real-time cyber threat 18 January 2024, Atos Don't be like these 900+ websites and expose millions of passwords via Firebase 18 March 2024, The Register Google Firebase may have exposed 125M records from misconfigurations 19 March 2024, SC Media provided by Google News		SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View 19 October 2023, SAP News provided by Google News

Share this page