DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. searchxml vs. Sequoiadb vs. TigerGraph

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. searchxml vs. Sequoiadb vs. TigerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	searchxml  Xexclude from comparison	Sequoiadb  Xexclude from comparison	TigerGraph  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	DBMS for structured and unstructured content wrapped with an application server	NewSQL database with distributed OLTP and SQL	A complete, distributed, parallel graph computing platform supporting web-scale data analytics in real-time
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Native XML DBMS Search engine	Document store Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.03 Rank #390   Overall #7   Native XML DBMS #24   Search engines	Score 0.50 Rank #258   Overall #41   Document stores #120   Relational DBMS	Score 1.80 Rank #138   Overall #13   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.searchxml.net/­category/­products	www.sequoiadb.com	www.tigergraph.com
Technical documentation		www.searchxml.net/­support/­handouts	www.sequoiadb.com/­en/­index.php?m=Files&a=index	docs.tigergraph.com
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	informationpartners gmbh	Sequoiadb Ltd.
Initial release	2016	2015	2013	2017
Current release	1703	1.0
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	Open Source Server: AGPL; Client: Apache V2	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C++	C++	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	Windows	Linux	Linux
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	schema-free	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes oid, date, timestamp, binary, regex	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	yes	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	SQL-like query language	SQL-like query language (GSQL)
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	RESTful HTTP API WebDAV XQuery XSLT	proprietary protocol using JSON	GSQL (TigerGraph Query Language) Kafka RESTful HTTP/JSON API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C++ most other programming languages supported via APIs	.Net C++ Java PHP Python	C++ Java
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes on the application server	JavaScript	yes
Triggers	yes	no	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	yes sychronisation to multiple collections	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	yes
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency	Eventual Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	yes Relationships in graphs
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	multiple readers, single writer	Document is locked during a transaction	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	no	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Domain, group and role-based access control at the document level and for application services	simple password-based access control	Role-based access control
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	searchxml	Sequoiadb	TigerGraph
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News			TigerGraph Unveils CoPilot, Version 4.0, and New CEO 30 April 2024, Datanami TigerGraph unveils GenAI assistant, introduces new CEO 30 April 2024, TechTarget How TigerGraph CoPilot enables graph-augmented AI 30 April 2024, InfoWorld TigerGraph Bolsters DB for Enterprise Graph Workloads 1 November 2023, Datanami Aerospike takes on Neo4j and TigerGraph with launch of graph database 20 June 2023, SiliconANGLE News provided by Google News

Share this page