DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Percona Server for MongoDB vs. SiriDB vs. TimesTen

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Percona Server for MongoDB vs. SiriDB vs. TimesTen

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Percona Server for MongoDB  Xexclude from comparison	SiriDB  Xexclude from comparison	TimesTen  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A drop-in replacement for MongoDB Community Edition with enterprise-grade features.	Open Source Time Series DBMS	In-Memory RDBMS compatible to Oracle
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Document store	Time Series DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.60 Rank #246   Overall #39   Document stores	Score 0.07 Rank #378   Overall #42   Time Series DBMS	Score 1.36 Rank #161   Overall #75   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.percona.com/­mongodb/­software/­percona-server-for-mongodb	siridb.com	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­timesten.html
Technical documentation		docs.percona.com/­percona-distribution-for-mongodb	docs.siridb.com	docs.oracle.com/­database/­timesten-18.1
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Percona	Cesbit	Oracle, TimesTen Performance Software, HP originally founded in HP Labs it was acquired by Oracle in 2005
Initial release	2016	2015	2017	1998
Current release	1703	3.4.10-2.10, November 2017		11 Release 2 (11.2.2.8.0)
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source GPL Version 2	Open Source MIT License	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C++	C
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux	Linux	AIX HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris SPARC/x86 Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes Numeric data	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	no	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	proprietary protocol using JSON	HTTP API	JDBC ODBC ODP.NET Oracle Call Interface (OCI)
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Actionscript C C# C++ Clojure ColdFusion D Dart Delphi Erlang Go Groovy Haskell Java JavaScript Lisp Lua MatLab Perl PHP PowerShell Prolog Python R Ruby Scala Smalltalk	C C++ Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) PHP Python R	C C++ Java PL/SQL
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	JavaScript	no	PL/SQL
Triggers	yes	no	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	Sharding	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Source-replica replication	yes	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		yes	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency		Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	no	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes by means of logfiles and checkpoints
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes via In-Memory Engine	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Access rights for users and roles	simple rights management via user accounts	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Percona Server for MongoDB	SiriDB	TimesTen
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	MongoDB Performance Tuning 23 May 2024, Database Trends and Applications How to Plan Your MongoDB Upgrade 29 January 2024, The New Stack There are lots of ways to put a database in the cloud – here's what to consider 15 September 2023, The Register Why Isn't the World Upgrading Its Databases? 25 March 2024, The New Stack FerretDB goes GA: Gives you MongoDB, without the MongoDB... 15 May 2023, The Stack provided by Google News

Share this page