DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. mSQL vs. OrigoDB vs. SAP Adaptive Server

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. mSQL vs. OrigoDB vs. SAP Adaptive Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	mSQL Mini SQL  Xexclude from comparison	OrigoDB  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Adaptive Server former name: Sybase ASE  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	mSQL (Mini SQL) is a simple and lightweight RDBMS	A fully ACID in-memory object graph database	The SAP (Sybase) Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is an enterprise-class RDBMS
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Document store Object oriented DBMS	Relational DBMS
Secondary database models				Spatial DBMS with Boeing's Spatial Query Server
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 1.27 Rank #169   Overall #76   Relational DBMS	Score 0.06 Rank #380   Overall #50   Document stores #18   Object oriented DBMS	Score 35.09 Rank #25   Overall #17   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	hughestech.com.au/­products/­msql	origodb.com	www.sap.com/­products/­technology-platform/­sybase-ase.html
Technical documentation			origodb.com/­docs	help.sap.com/­docs/­SAP_ASE
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Hughes Technologies	Robert Friberg et al	SAP, Sybase
Initial release	2016	1994	2009 under the name LiveDB	1987
Current release	1703	4.4, October 2021		16.0
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free licenses can be provided	Open Source	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C	C#	C and C++
Server operating systems	Linux	AIX HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris SPARC/x86 Windows	Linux Windows	AIX HP-UX Linux Solaris Unix Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	User defined using .NET types and collections	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no can be achieved using .NET	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented no subqueries, aggregate functions, views, foreign keys, triggers	no	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	JDBC ODBC	.NET Client API HTTP API LINQ	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB Tabular Data Stream (TDS)
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C++ Delphi Java Perl PHP Tcl	.Net	C C++ Cobol Java Java Perl PHP Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	yes	Java and Transact-SQL
Triggers	yes	no	yes Domain Events	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	horizontal partitioning client side managed; servers are not synchronized	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	depending on model	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	no	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes Write ahead log	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	Role based authorization	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	mSQL Mini SQL	OrigoDB	SAP Adaptive Server former name: Sybase ASE
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	Higher Education PS rules out ghost students before PAC 29 November 2018, diggers.news provided by Google News		Achieve zero RPO for your SAP ASE (Sybase) databases with Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP | Amazon Web Services 7 May 2024, AWS Blog New Services for SAP HANA Cloud Database 7 April 2021, SAP News Patch SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise now to avoid takeover risk 3 June 2020, BleepingComputer Newly Patched SAP ASE Flaws Could Let Attackers Hack Database Servers 3 June 2020, The Hacker News Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 15.7 Boosts Performance and Lowers Cost of Managing Exploding Data Volumes 13 September 2011, PR Newswire provided by Google News

Share this page