DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Oracle Berkeley DB vs. SwayDB vs. Yaacomo

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Oracle Berkeley DB vs. SwayDB vs. Yaacomo

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Oracle Berkeley DB  Xexclude from comparison	SwayDB  Xexclude from comparison	Yaacomo  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.			Yaacomo seems to be discontinued and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Widely used in-process key-value store	An embeddable, non-blocking, type-safe key-value store for single or multiple disks and in-memory storage	OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store supports sorted and unsorted key sets Native XML DBMS in the Oracle Berkeley DB XML version	Key-value store	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 2.01 Rank #126   Overall #21   Key-value stores #3   Native XML DBMS	Score 0.04 Rank #387   Overall #61   Key-value stores
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­berkeleydb.html	swaydb.simer.au	yaacomo.com
Technical documentation		docs.oracle.com/­cd/­E17076_05/­html/­index.html
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Oracle originally developed by Sleepycat, which was acquired by Oracle	Simer Plaha	Q2WEB GmbH
Initial release	2016	1994	2018	2009
Current release	1703	18.1.40, May 2020
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source commercial license available	Open Source GNU Affero GPL V3.0	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C, Java, C++ (depending on the Berkeley DB edition)	Scala
Server operating systems	Linux	AIX Android FreeBSD iOS Linux OS X Solaris VxWorks Windows		Android Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	schema-free	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	no	no	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	yes only with the Berkeley DB XML edition	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes SQL interfaced based on SQLite is available	no	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP			JDBC ODBC
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net Figaro is a .Net framework assembly that extends Berkeley DB XML into an embeddable database engine for .NET others Third-party libraries to manipulate Berkeley DB files are available for many languages C C# C++ Java JavaScript (Node.js) 3rd party binding Perl Python Tcl	Java Kotlin Scala
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	no
Triggers	yes	yes only for the SQL API	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Source-replica replication	none	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	Atomic execution of operations	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes		yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Oracle Berkeley DB	SwayDB	Yaacomo
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	ACM recognizes far-reaching technical achievements with special awards 26 May 2021, EurekAlert Margo I. Seltzer | Berkman Klein Center 18 August 2020, Berkman Klein Center Database Trends Report: SQL Beats NoSQL, MySQL Most Popular -- ADTmag 5 March 2019, ADT Magazine What You Need to Know About NoSQL Databases 17 February 2012, Forbes How to store financial market data for backtesting 26 January 2019, Towards Data Science provided by Google News

Share this page