DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Manticore Search vs. Newts vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Manticore Search vs. Newts vs. OrigoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Manticore Search  Xexclude from comparison	Newts  Xexclude from comparison	OrigoDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Multi-storage database for search, including full-text search.	Time Series DBMS based on Cassandra	A fully ACID in-memory object graph database
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Search engine	Time Series DBMS	Document store Object oriented DBMS
Secondary database models		Time Series DBMS using the Manticore Columnar Library
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.29 Rank #302   Overall #21   Search engines	Score 0.07 Rank #375   Overall #41   Time Series DBMS	Score 0.06 Rank #380   Overall #50   Document stores #18   Object oriented DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	manticoresearch.com	opennms.github.io/­newts	origodb.com
Technical documentation		manual.manticoresearch.com	github.com/­OpenNMS/­newts/­wiki	origodb.com/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Manticore Software	OpenNMS Group	Robert Friberg et al
Initial release	2016	2017	2014	2009 under the name LiveDB
Current release	1703	6.0, February 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source GPL version 2	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C++	Java	C#
Server operating systems	Linux	FreeBSD Linux macOS Windows	Linux OS X Windows	Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	Fixed schema	schema-free	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	Int, Bigint, Float, Timestamp, Bit, Int array, Bigint array, JSON, Boolean	yes	User defined using .NET types and collections
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	Can index from XML	no	no can be achieved using .NET
Secondary indexes	yes	yes full-text index on all search fields	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like query language	no	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Binary API RESTful HTTP/JSON API RESTful HTTP/SQL API SQL over MySQL	HTTP REST Java API	.NET Client API HTTP API LINQ
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Elixir Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python	Java	.Net
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	user defined functions	no	yes
Triggers	yes	no	no	yes Domain Events
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported	Sharding based on Cassandra	horizontal partitioning client side managed; servers are not synchronized
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Synchronous replication based on Galera library	selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	depending on model
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	yes isolated transactions for atomic changes and binary logging for safe writes	no	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes The original contents of fields are not stored in the Manticore index.	yes	yes Write ahead log
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	no	Role based authorization
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Manticore Search	Newts	OrigoDB
Recent citations in the news		Manticore Search Now Integrates With Grafana 9 August 2023, hackernoon.com Integrating Manticore Search with Apache Superset 8 August 2023, hackernoon.com Clickhouse vs Elasticsearch vs Manticore Search Query Times With a 1.7B NYC Taxi Rides Benchmark 1 June 2022, hackernoon.com 8 Google Alternatives: How to Search Crypto, the Dark Web, More 1 February 2023, Gizmodo Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++ 25 July 2022, hackernoon.com provided by Google News

Share this page