DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Machbase Neo vs. OushuDB vs. Prometheus

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Machbase Neo vs. OushuDB vs. Prometheus

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Machbase Neo Former name was Infiniflux  Xexclude from comparison	OushuDB  Xexclude from comparison	Prometheus  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	TimeSeries DBMS for AIoT and BigData	A data warehouse powered by Apache HAWQ supporting descriptive analysis and advanced machine learning	Open-source Time Series DBMS and monitoring system
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Relational DBMS	Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.17 Rank #337   Overall #30   Time Series DBMS	Score 0.10 Rank #355   Overall #154   Relational DBMS	Score 7.69 Rank #50   Overall #3   Time Series DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	machbase.com	www.oushu.com/­product/­oushuDB	prometheus.io
Technical documentation		machbase.com/­dbms	www.oushu.com/­documentation	prometheus.io/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Machbase	Oushu
Initial release	2016	2013		2015
Current release	1703	V8.0, August 2023	4.0.1, August 2020
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free test version available	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C		Go
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux macOS Windows	Linux	Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	Numeric data only
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no		no Import of XML data possible
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like query language	Full-featured ANSI SQL support	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	gRPC HTTP REST JDBC MQTT (Message Queue Telemetry Transport) ODBC	JDBC ODBC	RESTful HTTP/JSON API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C# C++ Go Java JavaScript PHP via ODBC Python R via ODBC Scala	C C++	.Net C++ Go Haskell Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python Ruby
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	yes	no
Triggers	yes	no	yes	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	yes	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	selectable replication factor		yes by Federation
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	Hadoop integration	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration			none
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no		no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	no	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes volatile and lookup table		no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	simple password-based access control	Kerberos, SSL and role based access	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Machbase Neo Former name was Infiniflux	OushuDB	Prometheus
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News		China's answer to Snowflake is shaping as data demands upgrade 8 September 2021, PingWest provided by Google News	VTEX scales to 150 million metrics using Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus | Amazon Web Services 10 March 2024, AWS Blog OpenTelemetry vs. Prometheus: You can’t fix what you can’t see 29 March 2024, IBM VictoriaMetrics Offers Prometheus Replacement for Time Series Monitoring 17 July 2023, The New Stack Linux System Monitoring with Prometheus, Grafana, and collectd 1 February 2024, Linux Journal A Comprehensive Comparison of Prometheus and Grafana in 2023 8 December 2023, hackernoon.com provided by Google News

Share this page