DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Lovefield vs. Oracle Rdb vs. TigerGraph

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Lovefield vs. Oracle Rdb vs. TigerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Lovefield  Xexclude from comparison	Oracle Rdb  Xexclude from comparison	TigerGraph  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Embeddable relational database for web apps written in pure JavaScript		A complete, distributed, parallel graph computing platform supporting web-scale data analytics in real-time
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.33 Rank #286   Overall #131   Relational DBMS	Score 1.14 Rank #178   Overall #80   Relational DBMS	Score 1.80 Rank #138   Overall #13   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	google.github.io/­lovefield	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­rdb.html	www.tigergraph.com
Technical documentation		github.com/­google/­lovefield/­blob/­master/­docs/­spec_index.md	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­rdb-doc.html	docs.tigergraph.com
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Google	Oracle, originally developed by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC)
Initial release	2016	2014	1984	2017
Current release	1703	2.1.12, February 2017	7.4.1.1, 2021
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	JavaScript		C++
Server operating systems	Linux	server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js) tested with Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari	HP Open VMS	Linux
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like query language via JavaScript builder pattern	yes	SQL-like query language (GSQL)
APIs and other access methods	LDAP			GSQL (TigerGraph Query Language) Kafka RESTful HTTP/JSON API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	JavaScript		C++ Java
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no		yes
Triggers	yes	Using read-only observers		no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	yes
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	yes	yes Relationships in graphs
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	yes, on a single node	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes, by using IndexedDB or the cloud service Firebase Realtime Database	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes using MemoryDB	no	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no		Role-based access control
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Lovefield	Oracle Rdb	TigerGraph
Recent citations in the news			Oracle Adds New AI-Enabling Features To MySQL HeatWave 23 March 2023, Forbes Should we all consolidate databases for the storage benefits? Reg vultures deploy DevOps, zoos, haircuts 18 September 2020, The Register 2013 Data Science Salary Survey – O'Reilly 4 May 2013, O'Reilly Media provided by Google News	TigerGraph Unveils CoPilot, Version 4.0, and New CEO 30 April 2024, Datanami How TigerGraph CoPilot enables graph-augmented AI 30 April 2024, InfoWorld TigerGraph unveils GenAI assistant, introduces new CEO 30 April 2024, TechTarget TigerGraph Bolsters DB for Enterprise Graph Workloads 1 November 2023, Datanami Aerospike takes on Neo4j and TigerGraph with launch of graph database 20 June 2023, SiliconANGLE News provided by Google News

Share this page