DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Linter vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage vs. VelocityDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Linter vs. Microsoft Azure Table Storage vs. VelocityDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Linter  Xexclude from comparison	Microsoft Azure Table Storage  Xexclude from comparison	VelocityDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	RDBMS for high security requirements	A Wide Column Store for rapid development using massive semi-structured datasets	A .NET Object Database that can be embedded/distributed and extended to a graph data model (VelocityGraph)
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Wide column store	Graph DBMS Object oriented DBMS
Secondary database models		Spatial DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.12 Rank #350   Overall #152   Relational DBMS	Score 4.04 Rank #77   Overall #6   Wide column stores	Score 0.11 Rank #354   Overall #37   Graph DBMS #16   Object oriented DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	linter.ru	azure.microsoft.com/­en-us/­services/­storage/­tables	velocitydb.com
Technical documentation				velocitydb.com/­UserGuide
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	relex.ru	Microsoft	VelocityDB Inc
Initial release	2016	1990	2012	2011
Current release	1703			7.x
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	yes	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C and C++		C#
Server operating systems	Linux	AIX Android BSD HP Open VMS iOS Linux OS X VxWorks Windows	hosted	Any that supports .NET
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	schema-free	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes	no	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	ADO.NET JDBC LINQ ODBC OLE DB Oracle Call Interface (OCI)	RESTful HTTP API	.Net
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C# C++ Java Perl PHP Python Qt Ruby Tcl	.Net C# C++ Java JavaScript (Node.js) PHP Python Ruby	.Net
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes proprietary syntax with the possibility to convert from PL/SQL	no	no
Triggers	yes	yes	no	Callbacks are triggered when data changes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	Sharding Implicit feature of the cloud service	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Source-replica replication	yes implicit feature of the cloud service. Replication either local, cross-facility or geo-redundant.
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	optimistic locking	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	Access rights based on private key authentication or shared access signatures	Based on Windows Authentication
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Linter	Microsoft Azure Table Storage	VelocityDB
Recent citations in the news			Working with Azure to Use and Manage Data Lakes 7 March 2024, Simplilearn How to Use C# Azure.Data.Tables SDK with Azure Cosmos DB 9 July 2021, hackernoon.com How to use Azure Table storage in .Net 14 January 2019, InfoWorld Quick Guide to Azure Storage Pricing 16 May 2023, DevOps.com How to write data to Azure Table Store with an Azure Function 14 April 2017, Experts Exchange provided by Google News

Share this page