DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Interbase vs. Postgres-XL vs. Warp 10

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Interbase vs. Postgres-XL vs. Warp 10

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Interbase  Xexclude from comparison	Postgres-XL  Xexclude from comparison	Warp 10  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Light-weight proven RDBMS originally from Borland	Based on PostgreSQL enhanced with MPP and write-scale-out cluster features	TimeSeries DBMS specialized on timestamped geo data based on LevelDB or HBase
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Time Series DBMS
Secondary database models			Document store Spatial DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 4.08 Rank #75   Overall #41   Relational DBMS	Score 0.53 Rank #254   Overall #117   Relational DBMS	Score 0.14 Rank #344   Overall #32   Time Series DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.embarcadero.com/­products/­interbase	www.postgres-xl.org	www.warp10.io
Technical documentation		docs.embarcadero.com/­products/­interbase	www.postgres-xl.org/­documentation	www.warp10.io/­content/­02_Getting_started
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Embarcadero		SenX
Initial release	2016	1984	2014 since 2012, originally named StormDB	2015
Current release	1703	InterBase 2020, December 2019	10 R1, October 2018
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	Open Source Mozilla public license	Open Source Apache License 2.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C	C	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	Android iOS Linux OS X Windows	Linux macOS	Linux OS X Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no export as XML data possible	yes XML type, but no XML query functionality	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes	yes distributed, parallel query execution	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC	ADO.NET JDBC native C library ODBC streaming API for large objects	HTTP API Jupyter WebSocket
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net C C++ Delphi Java Object Pascal PHP Ruby	.Net C C++ Delphi Erlang Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python Tcl
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes Interbase procedure and trigger language	user defined functions	yes WarpScript
Triggers	yes	yes	yes	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	horizontal partitioning	Sharding based on HBase
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Interbase Change Views		selectable replication factor based on HBase
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency based on HBase
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID MVCC	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes Multiversion concurreny control	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	Mandatory use of cryptographic tokens, containing fine-grained authorizations
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Interbase	Postgres-XL	Warp 10
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	Borland InterBase backdoor detected | ZDNET 11 January 2001, ZDNet An independent soccer league transforming lives in a slum in Kenya 15 November 2022, FanSided Johnson Sakaja Donates KSh 200k to Support Cash Strapped Football Teams From Kibera - Tuko.co.ke 21 February 2024, Tuko.co.ke Malaysian e-commerce firm Lelong.my acquires local digital marketing agency Mataris Agency 29 January 2018, Yahoo Singapore News The advance of Air Force Esports 25 June 2023, New Zealand Defence Force provided by Google News		Time Series Databases Software market latest trends, CAGR, and forecast till 2026 | eSherpa Market Reports 13 April 2020, openPR provided by Google News

Share this page