DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. InterSystems Caché vs. Stardog vs. Transbase

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. InterSystems Caché vs. Stardog vs. Transbase

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	InterSystems Caché  Xexclude from comparison	Stardog  Xexclude from comparison	Transbase  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.	Caché is a deprecated database engine which is substituted with InterSystems IRIS. It therefore is removed from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A multi-model DBMS and application server	Enterprise Knowledge Graph platform and graph DBMS with high availability, high performance reasoning, and virtualization	A resource-optimized, high-performance, universally applicable RDBMS
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store Object oriented DBMS Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS RDF store	Relational DBMS
Secondary database models		Document store
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart			Score 2.07 Rank #122   Overall #11   Graph DBMS #6   RDF stores	Score 0.17 Rank #334   Overall #148   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.intersystems.com/­products/­cache	www.stardog.com	www.transaction.de/­en/­products/­transbase.html
Technical documentation		docs.intersystems.com	docs.stardog.com	www.transaction.de/­en/­products/­transbase/­features.html
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	InterSystems	Stardog-Union	Transaction Software GmbH
Initial release	2016	1997	2010	1987
Current release	1703	2018.1.4, May 2020	7.3.0, May 2020	Transbase 8.3, 2022
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	commercial 60-day fully-featured trial license; 1-year fully-featured non-commercial use license for academics/students	commercial free development license
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java		Java	C and C++
Server operating systems	Linux	AIX HP Open VMS HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris Windows	Linux macOS Windows	FreeBSD Linux macOS Solaris Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	depending on used data model	schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	yes	no Import/export of XML data possible	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes supports real-time indexing in full-text and geospatial	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes	Yes, compatible with all major SQL variants through dedicated BI/SQL Server	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	.NET Client API JDBC ODBC RESTful HTTP API	GraphQL query language HTTP API Jena RDF API OWL RDF4J API Sesame REST HTTP Protocol SNARL SPARQL Spring Data Stardog Studio TinkerPop 3	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC Proprietary native API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C# C++ Java	.Net Clojure Groovy Java JavaScript Python Ruby	C C# C++ Java JavaScript Kotlin Objective-C PHP Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes	user defined functions and aggregates, HTTP Server extensions in Java	yes
Triggers	yes	yes	yes via event handlers	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication in HA-Cluster	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency in HA-Cluster	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	yes relationships in graphs	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID	yes
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	yes	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Access rights for users, groups and roles	Access rights for users and roles	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	InterSystems Caché	Stardog	Transbase
Recent citations in the news		AWS, GCP, Oracle, Azure, SAP Lead Cloud DBMS Market: Gartner 12 February 2022, CRN Epic On EHR Interoperability: Not A '1-Time Project' 10 April 2015, InformationWeek Associative Data Modeling Demystified - Part1 - DataScienceCentral.com 9 July 2016, Data Science Central Announcing IBM Spectrum Sentinel: Building a Cyber Resilient Future 24 June 2022, IBM Choosing a Database Technology. A roadmap and process overview | by Shirish Joshi 23 February 2020, Towards Data Science provided by Google News

Share this page