DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Infobright vs. TimesTen vs. TinkerGraph

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Infobright vs. TimesTen vs. TinkerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Infobright  Xexclude from comparison	TimesTen  Xexclude from comparison	TinkerGraph  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend	In-Memory RDBMS compatible to Oracle	A lightweight, in-memory graph engine that serves as a reference implementation of the TinkerPop3 API
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 1.02 Rank #192   Overall #90   Relational DBMS	Score 1.36 Rank #161   Overall #75   Relational DBMS	Score 0.13 Rank #345   Overall #35   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	ignitetech.com/­softwarelibrary/­infobrightdb	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­timesten.html	tinkerpop.apache.org/­docs/­current/­reference/­#tinkergraph-gremlin
Technical documentation			docs.oracle.com/­database/­timesten-18.1
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.	Oracle, TimesTen Performance Software, HP originally founded in HP Labs it was acquired by Oracle in 2005
Initial release	2016	2005	1998	2009
Current release	1703		11 Release 2 (11.2.2.8.0)
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C		Java
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux Windows	AIX HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris SPARC/x86 Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	no Knowledge Grid Technology used instead	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC	JDBC ODBC ODP.NET Oracle Call Interface (OCI)	TinkerPop 3
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net C C# C++ D Eiffel Erlang Haskell Java Objective-C OCaml Perl PHP Python Ruby Scheme Tcl	C C++ Java PL/SQL	Groovy Java
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	PL/SQL	no
Triggers	yes	no	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes	yes Relationships in graphs
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	no
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes by means of logfiles and checkpoints	optional
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Infobright	TimesTen	TinkerGraph
Recent citations in the news				Unit testing Apache TinkerPop transactions: From TinkerGraph to Amazon Neptune | Amazon Web Services 3 June 2024, AWS Blog Simple Deployment of a Graph Database: JanusGraph | by Edward Elson Kosasih 12 October 2020, Towards Data Science Why developers like Apache TinkerPop, an open source framework for graph computing | Amazon Web Services 27 September 2021, AWS Blog InfiniteGraph Gets Support for Common Graph Database Language and More 21 February 2012, SiliconANGLE News Introducing Gremlin query hints for Amazon Neptune | AWS Database Blog 26 February 2019, AWS Blog provided by Google News

Share this page