DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. InfinityDB vs. Prometheus vs. SWC-DB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. InfinityDB vs. Prometheus vs. SWC-DB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	InfinityDB  Xexclude from comparison	Prometheus  Xexclude from comparison	SWC-DB Super Wide Column Database  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	A Java embedded Key-Value Store which extends the Java Map interface	Open-source Time Series DBMS and monitoring system	A high performance, scalable Wide Column DBMS
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Wide column store
Secondary database models				Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.08 Rank #365   Overall #55   Key-value stores	Score 7.69 Rank #50   Overall #3   Time Series DBMS	Score 0.08 Rank #364   Overall #13   Wide column stores
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	boilerbay.com	prometheus.io	github.com/­kashirin-alex/­swc-db www.swcdb.org
Technical documentation		boilerbay.com/­infinitydb/­manual	prometheus.io/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Boiler Bay Inc.		Alex Kashirin
Initial release	2016	2002	2015	2020
Current release	1703	4.0		0.5, April 2021
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source GPL V3
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java	Go	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	All OS with a Java VM	Linux Windows	Linux
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes nested virtual Java Maps, multi-value, logical ‘tuple space’ runtime Schema upgrade	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes all Java primitives, Date, CLOB, BLOB, huge sparse arrays	Numeric data only
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no Import of XML data possible	no
Secondary indexes	yes	no manual creation possible, using inversions based on multi-value capability	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	no	SQL-like query language
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Access via java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentNavigableMap Interface Proprietary API to InfinityDB ItemSpace (boilerbay.com/­docs/­ItemSpaceDataStructures.htm)	RESTful HTTP/JSON API	Proprietary protocol Thrift
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Java	.Net C++ Go Haskell Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python Ruby	C++
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	no	no
Triggers	yes	no	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	Sharding	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	yes by Federation
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency READ-COMMITTED or SERIALIZED	none	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no manual creation possible, using inversions based on multi-value capability	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID Optimistic locking for transactions; no isolation for bulk loads	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	no	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	InfinityDB	Prometheus	SWC-DB Super Wide Column Database
Recent citations in the news			VTEX scales to 150 million metrics using Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus | Amazon Web Services 10 March 2024, AWS Blog Exadata Real-Time Insight - Quick Start 3 April 2024, Oracle OpenTelemetry vs. Prometheus: You can’t fix what you can’t see 29 March 2024, IBM VictoriaMetrics Offers Prometheus Replacement for Time Series Monitoring 17 July 2023, The New Stack Linux System Monitoring with Prometheus, Grafana, and collectd 1 February 2024, Linux Journal provided by Google News	2022 All O-Zone Football Team 17 December 2022, Ozarks Sports Zone provided by Google News

Share this page