DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. HyperSQL vs. TimesTen vs. TinkerGraph

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. HyperSQL vs. TimesTen vs. TinkerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	HyperSQL also known as HSQLDB  Xexclude from comparison	TimesTen  Xexclude from comparison	TinkerGraph  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Multithreaded, transactional RDBMS written in Java also known as HSQLDB	In-Memory RDBMS compatible to Oracle	A lightweight, in-memory graph engine that serves as a reference implementation of the TinkerPop3 API
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Graph DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 3.23 Rank #93   Overall #48   Relational DBMS	Score 1.36 Rank #161   Overall #75   Relational DBMS	Score 0.13 Rank #345   Overall #35   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	hsqldb.org	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­timesten.html	tinkerpop.apache.org/­docs/­current/­reference/­#tinkergraph-gremlin
Technical documentation		hsqldb.org/­web/­hsqlDocsFrame.html	docs.oracle.com/­database/­timesten-18.1
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators		Oracle, TimesTen Performance Software, HP originally founded in HP Labs it was acquired by Oracle in 2005
Initial release	2016	2001	1998	2009
Current release	1703	2.7.2, June 2023	11 Release 2 (11.2.2.8.0)
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source based on BSD license	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java		Java
Server operating systems	Linux	All OS with a Java VM Embedded (into Java applications) and Client-Server operating modes	AIX HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris SPARC/x86 Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	HTTP API JDBC via HTTP JDBC ODBC	JDBC ODBC ODP.NET Oracle Call Interface (OCI)	TinkerPop 3
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC Java	C C++ Java PL/SQL	Groovy Java
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	Java, SQL	PL/SQL	no
Triggers	yes	yes	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	yes	yes Relationships in graphs
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	no
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes by means of logfiles and checkpoints	optional
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	HyperSQL also known as HSQLDB	TimesTen	TinkerGraph
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	HyperSQL DataBase flaw leaves library vulnerable to RCE 24 October 2022, The Daily Swig Introduction to JDBC with HSQLDB tutorial 14 November 2022, TheServerSide.com provided by Google News		Unit testing Apache TinkerPop transactions: From TinkerGraph to Amazon Neptune | Amazon Web Services 3 June 2024, AWS Blog Why developers like Apache TinkerPop, an open source framework for graph computing | Amazon Web Services 27 September 2021, AWS Blog InfiniteGraph Gets Support for Common Graph Database Language and More 21 February 2012, SiliconANGLE News Introducing Gremlin query hints for Amazon Neptune 26 February 2019, AWS Blog provided by Google News

Share this page