DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. GeoSpock vs. Lovefield vs. SiteWhere

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. GeoSpock vs. Lovefield vs. SiteWhere

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	GeoSpock  Xexclude from comparison	Lovefield  Xexclude from comparison	SiteWhere  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.	GeoSpock seems to be discontinued. Therefore it will be excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Spatial and temporal data processing engine for extreme data scale	Embeddable relational database for web apps written in pure JavaScript	M2M integration platform for persisting/querying time series data
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Time Series DBMS
Secondary database models		Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart			Score 0.33 Rank #286   Overall #131   Relational DBMS	Score 0.06 Rank #383   Overall #43   Time Series DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	geospock.com	google.github.io/­lovefield	github.com/­sitewhere/­sitewhere
Technical documentation			github.com/­google/­lovefield/­blob/­master/­docs/­spec_index.md	sitewhere1.sitewhere.io/­index.html
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	GeoSpock	Google	SiteWhere
Initial release	2016		2014	2010
Current release	1703	2.0, September 2019	2.1.12, February 2017
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	yes	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java, Javascript	JavaScript	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	hosted	server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js) tested with Chrome, Firefox, IE, Safari	Linux OS X Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	predefined scheme
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	temporal, categorical	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	ANSI SQL for query only (using Presto)	SQL-like query language via JavaScript builder pattern	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	JDBC		HTTP REST
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings		JavaScript
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	no
Triggers	yes	no	Using read-only observers
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Automatic sharding	none	Sharding based on HBase
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes		none	selectable replication factor based on HBase
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes, by using IndexedDB or the cloud service Firebase Realtime Database	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no	yes using MemoryDB	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Access rights for users can be defined per table	no	Users with fine-grained authorization concept
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	GeoSpock	Lovefield	SiteWhere
Recent citations in the news		How GeoSpock is supercharging geospatial analytics 23 February 2021, ComputerWeekly.com nChain Leads Investment Round in Extreme-scale Data Firm GeoSpock 2 October 2020, AlexaBlockchain Imagining an 'Everything Connected' World With Geospock | AWS Startups Blog 20 June 2019, AWS Blog GeoSpock launches Spatial Big Data Platform 2.0 4 September 2019, VanillaPlus GeoSpock launches pioneering new spatial Big Data platform 27 February 2019, Geospatial World provided by Google News		SiteWhere: An open platform for connected devices 11 July 2017, Open Source For You 11 Best Open source IoT Platforms To Develop Smart Projects 9 March 2023, H2S Media provided by Google News

Share this page