DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. GeoMesa vs. mSQL vs. Percona Server for MongoDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. GeoMesa vs. mSQL vs. Percona Server for MongoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	GeoMesa  Xexclude from comparison	mSQL Mini SQL  Xexclude from comparison	Percona Server for MongoDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	GeoMesa is a distributed spatio-temporal DBMS based on various systems as storage layer.	mSQL (Mini SQL) is a simple and lightweight RDBMS	A drop-in replacement for MongoDB Community Edition with enterprise-grade features.
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Spatial DBMS	Relational DBMS	Document store
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.86 Rank #205   Overall #4   Spatial DBMS	Score 1.27 Rank #169   Overall #76   Relational DBMS	Score 0.60 Rank #246   Overall #39   Document stores
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	www.geomesa.org	hughestech.com.au/­products/­msql	www.percona.com/­mongodb/­software/­percona-server-for-mongodb
Technical documentation		www.geomesa.org/­documentation/­stable/­user/­index.html		docs.percona.com/­percona-distribution-for-mongodb
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	CCRi and others	Hughes Technologies	Percona
Initial release	2016	2014	1994	2015
Current release	1703	5.0.0, May 2024	4.4, October 2021	3.4.10-2.10, November 2017
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Apache License 2.0	commercial free licenses can be provided	Open Source GPL Version 2
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Scala	C	C++
Server operating systems	Linux		AIX HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris SPARC/x86 Windows	Linux
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented no subqueries, aggregate functions, views, foreign keys, triggers	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP		JDBC ODBC	proprietary protocol using JSON
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings		C C++ Delphi Java Perl PHP Tcl	Actionscript C C# C++ Clojure ColdFusion D Dart Delphi Erlang Go Groovy Haskell Java JavaScript Lisp Lua MatLab Perl PHP PowerShell Prolog Python R Ruby Scala Smalltalk
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	no	JavaScript
Triggers	yes	no	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	depending on storage layer	none	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	depending on storage layer	none	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		yes	no	yes
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	depending on storage layer	none	Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	no	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	no	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	depending on storage layer	no	yes via In-Memory Engine
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	yes depending on the DBMS used for storage	no	Access rights for users and roles
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	GeoMesa	mSQL Mini SQL	Percona Server for MongoDB
DB-Engines blog posts		Spatial database management systems 6 April 2021, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news			Higher Education PS rules out ghost students before PAC 29 November 2018, diggers.news provided by Google News	MongoDB Performance Tuning 23 May 2024, Database Trends and Applications Why Isn't the World Upgrading Its Databases? 25 March 2024, The New Stack FerretDB goes GA: Gives you MongoDB, without the MongoDB... 15 May 2023, The Stack The essential guide to MongoDB security 2 February 2017, InfoWorld Open-source developers under corporate pressure to adopt less-permissive licenses, Percona CEO says 13 May 2021, The Register provided by Google News

Share this page