DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Galaxybase vs. Manticore Search vs. PostGIS

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Galaxybase vs. Manticore Search vs. PostGIS

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Galaxybase  Xexclude from comparison	Manticore Search  Xexclude from comparison	PostGIS  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Scalable, ACID-compliant native distributed parallel graph platform	Multi-storage database for search, including full-text search.	Spatial extension of PostgreSQL
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Graph DBMS	Search engine	Spatial DBMS
Secondary database models			Time Series DBMS using the Manticore Columnar Library	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.07 Rank #377   Overall #40   Graph DBMS	Score 0.29 Rank #302   Overall #21   Search engines	Score 21.72 Rank #29   Overall #1   Spatial DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	galaxybase.com	manticoresearch.com	postgis.net
Technical documentation			manual.manticoresearch.com	postgis.net/­documentation
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Chuanglin(Createlink) Technology Co., Ltd 浙江创邻科技有限公司	Manticore Software
Initial release	2016	2017	2017	2005
Current release	1703	Nov 20, November 2021	6.0, February 2023	3.4.2, February 2024
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	Open Source GPL version 2	Open Source GPL v2.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C and Java	C++	C
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux	FreeBSD Linux macOS Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	Strong typed schema	Fixed schema	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	Int, Bigint, Float, Timestamp, Bit, Int array, Bigint array, JSON, Boolean	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	Can index from XML	yes
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes full-text index on all search fields	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	SQL-like query language	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Browser interface console (shell) Graph API (Gremlin) OpenCypher Proprietary native API	Binary API RESTful HTTP/JSON API RESTful HTTP/SQL API SQL over MySQL
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go Java Python	Elixir Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	user defined procedures and functions	user defined functions	user defined functions
Triggers	yes		no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	Sharding Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported	yes based on PostgreSQL
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes		Synchronous replication based on Galera library	yes based on PostgreSQL
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes Relationships in graphs	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	yes isolated transactions for atomic changes and binary logging for safe writes	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes The original contents of fields are not stored in the Manticore index.	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes		no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Role-based access control	no	yes based on PostgreSQL
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Galaxybase	Manticore Search	PostGIS
DB-Engines blog posts				Spatial database management systems 6 April 2021, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news			Integrating Manticore Search with Apache Superset 8 August 2023, hackernoon.com Clickhouse vs Elasticsearch vs Manticore Search Query Times With a 1.7B NYC Taxi Rides Benchmark 1 June 2022, hackernoon.com Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++ 25 July 2022, hackernoon.com 8 Google Alternatives: How to Search Crypto, the Dark Web, More 1 February 2023, Gizmodo Highlighting in Search Results 24 May 2020, hackernoon.com provided by Google News

Share this page