DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Galaxybase vs. JanusGraph vs. ToroDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Galaxybase vs. JanusGraph vs. ToroDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Galaxybase  Xexclude from comparison	JanusGraph successor of Titan  Xexclude from comparison	ToroDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.			ToroDB seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Scalable, ACID-compliant native distributed parallel graph platform	A Graph DBMS optimized for distributed clusters It was forked from the latest code base of Titan in January 2017	A MongoDB-compatible JSON document store, built on top of PostgreSQL
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Graph DBMS	Graph DBMS	Document store
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.07 Rank #377   Overall #40   Graph DBMS	Score 2.02 Rank #125   Overall #12   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	galaxybase.com	janusgraph.org	github.com/­torodb/­server
Technical documentation			docs.janusgraph.org
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Chuanglin(Createlink) Technology Co., Ltd 浙江创邻科技有限公司	Linux Foundation; originally developed as Titan by Aurelius	8Kdata
Initial release	2016	2017	2017	2016
Current release	1703	Nov 20, November 2021	0.6.3, February 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source AGPL-V3
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C and Java	Java	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux	Linux OS X Unix Windows	All OS with a Java 7 VM
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	Strong typed schema	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes string, integer, double, boolean, date, object_id
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Browser interface console (shell) Graph API (Gremlin) OpenCypher Proprietary native API	Java API TinkerPop Blueprints TinkerPop Frames TinkerPop Gremlin TinkerPop Rexster
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go Java Python	Clojure Java Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	user defined procedures and functions	yes
Triggers	yes		yes	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	yes depending on the used storage backend (e.g. Cassandra, HBase, BerkeleyDB)	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes		yes	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	yes via Faunus, a graph analytics engine
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency	Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency	Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes Relationships in graphs	yes Relationships in graphs	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes Supports various storage backends: Cassandra, HBase, Berkeley DB, Akiban, Hazelcast	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Role-based access control	User authentification and security via Rexster Graph Server	Access rights for users and roles
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Galaxybase	JanusGraph successor of Titan	ToroDB
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News		Database Deep Dives: JanusGraph 8 August 2019, ibm.com JanusGraph Picks Up Where TitanDB Left Off 13 January 2017, Datanami From graph db to graph embedding. In 7 simple steps. | by Andy Greatorex 30 July 2020, Towards Data Science Nordstrom Builds Flexible Backend Ops with Kubernetes, Spark and JanusGraph 3 October 2019, The New Stack Compose for JanusGraph arrives on Bluemix 15 September 2017, ibm.com provided by Google News

Share this page