DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. EXASOL vs. IRONdb vs. MaxDB vs. Ultipa

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. EXASOL vs. IRONdb vs. MaxDB vs. Ultipa

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

IRONdb seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

High-performance, in-memory, MPP database specifically designed for in-memory analytics.

A distributed Time Series DBMS with a focus on scalability, fault tolerance and operational simplicity

A robust and reliable RDBMS optimized to run all major SAP solutions

High performance Graph DBMS supporting HTAP high availability cluster deployment

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.66
Rank	#138	Overall
	#64	Relational DBMS

Score	2.15
Rank	#115	Overall
	#55	Relational DBMS

Score	0.11
Rank	#338	Overall
	#32	Graph DBMS

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.exasol.com

www.circonus.com/solutions/time-series-database/

maxdb.sap.com

www.ultipa.com

Technical documentation

www.exasol.com/resources

docs.circonus.com/irondb/category/getting-started

maxdb.sap.com/documentation

www.ultipa.com/document

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Exasol

Circonus LLC.

SAP, acquired from Software AG (Adabas-D) in 1997

Ultipa

Initial release

2016

2000

2017

1984

2019

Current release

1703

V0.10.20, January 2018

7.9.10.12, February 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Limited community edition free

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C and C++

C++

Server operating systems

Linux

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

text, numeric, histograms

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language (Circonus Analytics Query Language: CAQL)

yes

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

.Net
JDBC
ODBC
WebSocket

HTTP API

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
WebDAV

RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

Java
Lua
Python
R

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lisp
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Scala

.Net
C#
Java
Perl
PHP
Python

C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

yes, in Lua

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

Sharding

Automatic, metric affinity per node

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

configurable replication factor, datacenter aware

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Hadoop integration

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

Immediate consistency per node, eventual consistency across nodes

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

Access rights for users, groups and roles according to SQL-standard

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Exasol gets jolt of AI with Espresso suite of capabilities
26 February 2024, TechTarget

Exasol Finds AI Underinvestment Leads to Business Failure, But Data Challenges Stall Rapid Adoption
14 May 2024, insideainews.com

Mathias Golombek, Chief Technology Officer of Exasol – Interview Series
21 May 2024, Unite.AI

WashTec: Data Analytics for optimizing car wash systems.
27 May 2024, All-About-Industries

It’s Back to the Database Future for Exasol CEO Tewes
26 October 2023, Datanami

provided by Google News

Application observability firm Apica buys telemetry data startup Circonus and adds more funding
21 February 2024, SiliconANGLE News

Apica gets $6 million in funding and buys Circonus -
21 February 2024, Enterprise Times

provided by Google News

SAP Content Server High Availability using Amazon EFS and SUSE
30 December 2020, AWS Blog

What is SAP S/4HANA?
21 March 2022, TechTarget

SAP Aligns Mainstream Maintenance Commitments Across Its Enterprise Solutions
11 August 2020, SAP News

Google Cloud adds backup vaults and centralized management
10 September 2024, Blocks & Files

Hana triumphs, MaxDB lives on
24 September 2015, e3mag.com

provided by Google News

Ultipa, Inc. Announces Key Updates to Its Global Partnership Program
21 August 2024, EIN News

provided by Google News

Share this page