Featured Products: Datastax Astra Milvus Neo4j

DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. EJDB vs. EsgynDB vs. OrigoDB vs. SQL.JS

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. EJDB vs. EsgynDB vs. OrigoDB vs. SQL.JS

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

Embeddable document-store database library with JSON representation of queries (in MongoDB style)

Enterprise-class SQL-on-Hadoop solution, powered by Apache Trafodion

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Port of SQLite to JavaScript

Primary database model

Document store
Key-value store

Relational DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.31
Rank	#296	Overall
	#44	Document stores

Score	0.25
Rank	#312	Overall
	#138	Relational DBMS

Score	0.06
Rank	#380	Overall
	#50	Document stores
	#18	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.63
Rank	#241	Overall
	#112	Relational DBMS

Website

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

github.com/Softmotions/ejdb

Technical documentation

github.com/Softmotions/ejdb/blob/master/README.md

origodb.com/docs

sql.js.org/documentation/index.html

Developer

Atos Convergence Creators

Softmotions

Esgyn

Robert Friberg et al

Alon Zakai

enhancements implemented by others

Initial release

2016

2012

2015

2009

under the name LiveDB

2012

Current release

1703

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

GPLv2

commercial

Open Source

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

no

no

no

no

no

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C

C++, Java

C#

JavaScript

Server operating systems

Linux

server-less

Linux

Linux
Windows

server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js)

Data scheme

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

schema-free

yes

yes

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

string, integer, double, bool, date, object_id

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

no

no

can be achieved using .NET

no

Secondary indexes

yes

no

yes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

no

no

yes

no

yes

SQL-92 is not fully supported

APIs and other access methods

LDAP

in-process shared library

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

JavaScript API

Supported programming languages

All languages with LDAP bindings

Actionscript
C
C#
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lua
Objective-C
Pike
Python
Ruby

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC/ADO.Net

.Net

JavaScript

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

no

no

Java Stored Procedures

yes

no

Triggers

yes

no

no

yes

Domain Events

no

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

cell division

none

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

none

Multi-source replication between multi datacenters

Source-replica replication

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

no

yes

no

no

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

no

no

typically not needed, however similar functionality with collection joins possible

yes

depending on model

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic execution of specific operations

no

ACID

ACID

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes

Read/Write Locking

yes

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes

yes

yes

Write ahead log

no

except by serializing a db to a file

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

no

yes

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

no

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Role based authorization

no

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

New kids on the block: database management systems implemented in JavaScript
1 December 2014, Matthias Gelbmann

Recent citations in the news

9 Best JavaScript and TypeScript ORMs for 2024 — SitePoint
22 March 2023, SitePoint

Execute millions of SQL statements in milliseconds in the browser with WebAssembly and Web Workers.
14 January 2017, hackernoon.com

SQLite On The Web: Absurd-sql
24 August 2021, Hackaday

In Praise Of SQLite
28 July 2022, iProgrammer

10 Low-Code Rules for Serious Coders
21 November 2022, Embedded Computing Design

provided by Google News

Share this page

Featured Products

Present your product here