DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Drizzle vs. Google Cloud Bigtable vs. SwayDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Drizzle vs. Google Cloud Bigtable vs. SwayDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Drizzle  Xexclude from comparison	Google Cloud Bigtable  Xexclude from comparison	SwayDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.	Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	MySQL fork with a pluggable micro-kernel and with an emphasis of performance over compatibility.	Google's NoSQL Big Data database service. It's the same database that powers many core Google services, including Search, Analytics, Maps, and Gmail.	An embeddable, non-blocking, type-safe key-value store for single or multiple disks and in-memory storage
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Key-value store Wide column store	Key-value store
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart			Score 3.15 Rank #95   Overall #14   Key-value stores #8   Wide column stores	Score 0.04 Rank #387   Overall #61   Key-value stores
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository		cloud.google.com/­bigtable	swaydb.simer.au
Technical documentation			cloud.google.com/­bigtable/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker	Google	Simer Plaha
Initial release	2016	2008	2015	2018
Current release	1703	7.2.4, September 2012
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source GNU GPL	commercial	Open Source GNU Affero GPL V3.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	yes	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C++		Scala
Server operating systems	Linux	FreeBSD Linux OS X	hosted
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	schema-free	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	no	no
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes		no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes with proprietary extensions	no	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	JDBC	gRPC (using protocol buffers) API HappyBase (Python library) HBase compatible API (Java)
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C++ Java PHP	C# C++ Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python	Java Kotlin Scala
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	no	no
Triggers	yes	no hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	Sharding	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication	Internal replication in Colossus, and regional replication between two clusters in different zones	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	yes	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate consistency (for a single cluster), Eventual consistency (for two or more replicated clusters)	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	Atomic single-row operations	Atomic execution of operations
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Pluggable authentication mechanisms e.g. LDAP, HTTP	Access rights for users, groups and roles based on Google Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM)	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Drizzle	Google Cloud Bigtable	SwayDB
DB-Engines blog posts		MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow? 1 April 2015, Paul Andlinger Has MySQL finally lost its mojo? 1 July 2013, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news			Google's AI-First Strategy Brings Vector Support To Cloud Databases 1 March 2024, Forbes Google Introduces Autoscaling for Cloud Bigtable for Optimizing Costs 31 January 2022, InfoQ.com Google introduces Cloud Bigtable managed NoSQL database to process data at scale 6 May 2015, VentureBeat Google Launches Cloud Bigtable, A Highly Scalable And Performant NoSQL Database 6 May 2015, TechCrunch Now anyone can use the database behind Google's most popular products 6 May 2015, Fortune provided by Google News

Share this page