DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Drizzle vs. EsgynDB vs. VictoriaMetrics

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Drizzle vs. EsgynDB vs. VictoriaMetrics

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Drizzle  Xexclude from comparison	EsgynDB  Xexclude from comparison	VictoriaMetrics  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.	Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	MySQL fork with a pluggable micro-kernel and with an emphasis of performance over compatibility.	Enterprise-class SQL-on-Hadoop solution, powered by Apache Trafodion	A fast, cost-effective and scalable Time Series DBMS and monitoring solution
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS	Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart			Score 0.25 Rank #312   Overall #138   Relational DBMS	Score 1.23 Rank #172   Overall #15   Time Series DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository		www.esgyn.cn	victoriametrics.com
Technical documentation				docs.victoriametrics.com github.com/­VictoriaMetrics/­VictoriaMetrics/­wiki
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker	Esgyn	VictoriaMetrics
Initial release	2016	2008	2015	2018
Current release	1703	7.2.4, September 2012		v1.91, May 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source GNU GPL	commercial	Open Source Apache Version 2.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C++	C++, Java	Go
Server operating systems	Linux	FreeBSD Linux OS X	Linux	FreeBSD Linux macOS OpenBSD
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes		no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	yes with proprietary extensions	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	JDBC	ADO.NET JDBC ODBC	Graphite protocol InfluxDB Line Protocol OpenTSDB Prometheus Query API Prometheus Remote Read/Write
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C++ Java PHP	All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC/ADO.Net
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	Java Stored Procedures	no
Triggers	yes	no hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication	Multi-source replication between multi datacenters	Synchronous replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	yes	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate Consistency	Eventual Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	ACID	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		no	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Pluggable authentication mechanisms e.g. LDAP, HTTP	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Drizzle	EsgynDB	VictoriaMetrics
DB-Engines blog posts		MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow? 1 April 2015, Paul Andlinger Has MySQL finally lost its mojo? 1 July 2013, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news				OpenTelemetry Is Too Complicated, VictoriaMetrics Says 1 April 2024, Datanami KubeCon24: VictoriaMetrics' Simpler Alternative to Prometheus 20 March 2024, The New Stack VictoriaMetrics Slashes Data Storage Bills by 90% With World's Most Cost-Efficient Monitoring 30 May 2024, Yahoo Finance How VictoriaMetrics' open source approach led to mass industry adoption 3 May 2024, Tech.eu VictoriaMetrics takes organic growth over investor pressure 11 December 2023, The Register provided by Google News

Share this page