DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Cachelot.io vs. Memcached vs. searchxml

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Cachelot.io vs. Memcached vs. searchxml

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Cachelot.io  Xexclude from comparison	Memcached  Xexclude from comparison	searchxml  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	In-memory caching system	In-memory key-value store, originally intended for caching	DBMS for structured and unstructured content wrapped with an application server
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Key-value store	Key-value store	Native XML DBMS Search engine
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.04 Rank #388   Overall #62   Key-value stores	Score 18.08 Rank #32   Overall #4   Key-value stores	Score 0.03 Rank #390   Overall #7   Native XML DBMS #24   Search engines
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	cachelot.io	www.memcached.org	www.searchxml.net/­category/­products
Technical documentation			github.com/­memcached/­memcached/­wiki	www.searchxml.net/­support/­handouts
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators		Danga Interactive originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick for LiveJournal	informationpartners gmbh
Initial release	2016	2015	2003	2015
Current release	1703		1.6.27, May 2024	1.0
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source Simplified BSD License	Open Source BSD license	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C++	C	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	FreeBSD Linux OS X	FreeBSD Linux OS X Unix Windows	Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	schema-free	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	no	no	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no		yes
Secondary indexes	yes	no	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	no	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Memcached protocol	Proprietary protocol	RESTful HTTP API WebDAV XQuery XSLT
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	.Net C C++ ColdFusion Erlang Java Lisp Lua OCaml OCaml Perl PHP Python Ruby	.Net C C++ ColdFusion Erlang Java Lisp Lua OCaml Perl PHP Python Ruby	C++ most other programming languages supported via APIs
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	no	yes on the application server
Triggers	yes	no	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	none Repcached, a Memcached patch, provides this functionallity	yes sychronisation to multiple collections
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	no	multiple readers, single writer
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	no	no	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	no		no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	yes using SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) protocol	Domain, group and role-based access control at the document level and for application services
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Cachelot.io	Memcached	searchxml
DB-Engines blog posts			Redis extends the lead in the DB-Engines key-value store ranking 3 February 2014, Matthias Gelbmann New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems 3 October 2012, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger show all
Recent citations in the news			Why DDoS Threat Actors Are Shifting Their Tactics 15 March 2024, Infosecurity Magazine Ubuntu 24.04 Helping Achieve Greater Performance On Intel Xeon Scalable Emerald Rapids 8 March 2024, Phoronix Why Redis beats Memcached for caching 14 September 2017, InfoWorld Memcached DDoS: The biggest, baddest denial of service attacker yet 1 March 2018, ZDNet What are memcached servers, and why are they being used to launch record-setting DDoS attacks? 6 March 2018, GeekWire provided by Google News

Share this page