DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. searchxml vs. SurrealDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. searchxml vs. SurrealDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	BigObject  Xexclude from comparison	searchxml  Xexclude from comparison	SurrealDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries	DBMS for structured and unstructured content wrapped with an application server	A fully ACID transactional, developer-friendly, multi-model DBMS
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed	Native XML DBMS Search engine	Document store Graph DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.19 Rank #329   Overall #146   Relational DBMS	Score 0.03 Rank #390   Overall #7   Native XML DBMS #24   Search engines	Score 1.02 Rank #190   Overall #33   Document stores #18   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	bigobject.io	www.searchxml.net/­category/­products	surrealdb.com
Technical documentation		docs.bigobject.io	www.searchxml.net/­support/­handouts	surrealdb.com/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	BigObject, Inc.	informationpartners gmbh	SurrealDB Ltd
Initial release	2016	2015	2015	2022
Current release	1703		1.0	v1.5.0, May 2024
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free community edition available	commercial	Open Source
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java		C++	Rust
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux distributed as a docker-image OS X distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker) Windows distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)	Windows	Linux macOS Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	schema-free	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	yes
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like DML and DDL statements	no	SQL-like query language
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	fluentd ODBC RESTful HTTP API	RESTful HTTP API WebDAV XQuery XSLT	GraphQL RESTful HTTP API WebSocket
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings		C++ most other programming languages supported via APIs	Deno Go JavaScript (Node.js) Rust
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	Lua	yes on the application server
Triggers	yes	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	yes sychronisation to multiple collections
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes automatically between fact table and dimension tables	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	multiple readers, single writer	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	Domain, group and role-based access control at the document level and for application services	yes, based on authentication and database rules
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	BigObject	searchxml	SurrealDB
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News			SD Times Open-Source Project of the Week: SurrealDB 10 May 2024, SDTimes.com Meet Tobie Morgan Hitchcock, CEO & Co-Founder Of SurrealDB 25 April 2024, TechRound Cloud, privacy and AI: Trends defining the future of data and databases 27 September 2023, Sifted SurrealDB raises $6M for its database-as-a-service offering 4 January 2023, TechCrunch Introducing SurrealDB: A Quantum Leap in Database Technology 11 September 2023, TechRound provided by Google News

Share this page