DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Oracle Rdb vs. searchxml

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Oracle Rdb vs. searchxml

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	BigObject  Xexclude from comparison	Oracle Rdb  Xexclude from comparison	searchxml  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries		DBMS for structured and unstructured content wrapped with an application server
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed	Relational DBMS	Native XML DBMS Search engine
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.19 Rank #329   Overall #146   Relational DBMS	Score 1.14 Rank #178   Overall #80   Relational DBMS	Score 0.03 Rank #390   Overall #7   Native XML DBMS #24   Search engines
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	bigobject.io	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­rdb.html	www.searchxml.net/­category/­products
Technical documentation		docs.bigobject.io	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­rdb-doc.html	www.searchxml.net/­support/­handouts
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	BigObject, Inc.	Oracle, originally developed by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC)	informationpartners gmbh
Initial release	2016	2015	1984	2015
Current release	1703		7.4.1.1, 2021	1.0
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free community edition available	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java			C++
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux distributed as a docker-image OS X distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker) Windows distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)	HP Open VMS	Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	yes
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like DML and DDL statements	yes	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	fluentd ODBC RESTful HTTP API		RESTful HTTP API WebDAV XQuery XSLT
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings			C++ most other programming languages supported via APIs
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	Lua		yes on the application server
Triggers	yes	no		no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none		none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none		yes sychronisation to multiple collections
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes automatically between fact table and dimension tables	yes	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	yes, on a single node	multiple readers, single writer
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	no	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no		Domain, group and role-based access control at the document level and for application services
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	BigObject	Oracle Rdb	searchxml
Recent citations in the news			Oracle Adds New AI-Enabling Features To MySQL HeatWave 23 March 2023, Forbes Should we all consolidate databases for the storage benefits? Reg vultures deploy DevOps, zoos, haircuts 18 September 2020, The Register 2013 Data Science Salary Survey – O'Reilly 4 May 2013, O'Reilly Media provided by Google News

Share this page