DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Oracle Rdb vs. SAP SQL Anywhere

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Oracle Rdb vs. SAP SQL Anywhere

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	BigObject  Xexclude from comparison	Oracle Rdb  Xexclude from comparison	SAP SQL Anywhere formerly called Adaptive Server Anywhere  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries		RDBMS database and synchronization technologies for server, desktop, remote office, and mobile environments
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed	Relational DBMS	Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.19 Rank #329   Overall #146   Relational DBMS	Score 1.14 Rank #178   Overall #80   Relational DBMS	Score 3.95 Rank #80   Overall #42   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	bigobject.io	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­rdb.html	www.sap.com/­products/­technology-platform/­sql-anywhere.html
Technical documentation		docs.bigobject.io	www.oracle.com/­database/­technologies/­related/­rdb-doc.html	help.sap.com/­docs/­SAP_SQL_Anywhere
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	BigObject, Inc.	Oracle, originally developed by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC)	SAP formerly Sybase
Initial release	2016	2015	1984	1992
Current release	1703		7.4.1.1, 2021	17, July 2015
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free community edition available	commercial	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux distributed as a docker-image OS X distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker) Windows distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)	HP Open VMS	AIX HP-UX Linux OS X Solaris Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	yes
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like DML and DDL statements	yes	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	fluentd ODBC RESTful HTTP API		ADO.NET HTTP API JDBC ODBC
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings			C C# C++ Delphi Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python Ruby
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	Lua		yes, in C/C++, Java, .Net or Perl
Triggers	yes	no		yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none		none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none		Source-replica replication Database mirroring
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes automatically between fact table and dimension tables	yes	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	yes, on a single node	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no		fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	BigObject	Oracle Rdb	SAP SQL Anywhere formerly called Adaptive Server Anywhere
Recent citations in the news			Oracle Adds New AI-Enabling Features To MySQL HeatWave 23 March 2023, Forbes Should we all consolidate databases for the storage benefits? Reg vultures deploy DevOps, zoos, haircuts 18 September 2020, The Register 2013 Data Science Salary Survey – O'Reilly 4 May 2013, O'Reilly Media provided by Google News	SAP vulnerabilities Let Attacker Inject OS Commands—Patch Now! 11 July 2023, CybersecurityNews SAP Again Named a Leader in 2021 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Cloud Database Management Systems 21 December 2021, SAP News Rimini Street expands support beyond SAP and Oracle 9 June 2017, InsideSAP Securing SAP with AWS Network Firewall: Part 2 – Managed Rules | Amazon Web Services 17 July 2023, AWS Blog Rimini Street to offer database, security services 7 June 2017, ZDNet provided by Google News

Share this page