DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. atoti vs. BigObject vs. IBM Cloudant

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. atoti vs. BigObject vs. IBM Cloudant

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	atoti  Xexclude from comparison	BigObject  Xexclude from comparison	IBM Cloudant  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	An in-memory DBMS combining transactional and analytical processing to handle the aggregation of ever-changing data.	Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries	Database as a Service offering based on Apache CouchDB
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Object oriented DBMS	Relational DBMS a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed	Document store
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.61 Rank #243   Overall #11   Object oriented DBMS	Score 0.19 Rank #329   Overall #146   Relational DBMS	Score 2.75 Rank #104   Overall #19   Document stores
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	atoti.io	bigobject.io	www.ibm.com/­products/­cloudant
Technical documentation		docs.atoti.io	docs.bigobject.io	cloud.ibm.com/­docs/­Cloudant
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	ActiveViam	BigObject, Inc.	IBM, Apache Software Foundation IBM acquired Cloudant in February 2014
Initial release	2016		2015	2010
Current release	1703
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free versions available	commercial free community edition available	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	yes
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java		Erlang
Server operating systems	Linux		Linux distributed as a docker-image OS X distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker) Windows distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)	hosted
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views		yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional		yes	no
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes		no	no
Secondary indexes	yes		yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	Multidimensional Expressions (MDX)	SQL-like DML and DDL statements	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP		fluentd ODBC RESTful HTTP API	RESTful HTTP/JSON API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings			C# Java JavaScript Objective-C PHP Ruby
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	Python	Lua	View functions (Map-Reduce) in JavaScript
Triggers	yes		no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding, horizontal partitioning	none	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes		none	Multi-source replication Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	yes
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		none	Eventual Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no		yes automatically between fact table and dimension tables	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations		no	no atomic operations within a document possible
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)	yes Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)	yes Optimistic locking
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes		yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	yes	no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication		no	Access rights for users can be defined per database
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	atoti	BigObject	IBM Cloudant
Recent citations in the news		Overview Of Atoti: A Python BI Analytics Tool – AIM 14 May 2021, Analytics India Magazine FRTB product of the year: ActiveViam 28 November 2023, Risk.net provided by Google News		Cloudant Best (and Worst) Practices — Part 1 18 March 2019, ibm.com Intro to Enterprise Cloud Storage: How to Set Up a Cloudant Database 1 December 2014, Linux.com IBM Expands Cloud Database Services with Kubernetes 26 September 2019, EnterpriseAI IBM Code Engine and IBM Cloudant: Serverless Data and Infrastructure 16 August 2021, ibm.com IBM to Purchase Cloudant Database as a service (DBaaS) Provider 22 March 2014, App Developer Magazine provided by Google News

Share this page