DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Databend vs. Sequoiadb

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BigObject vs. Databend vs. Sequoiadb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	BigObject  Xexclude from comparison	Databend  Xexclude from comparison	Sequoiadb  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Analytic DBMS for real-time computations and queries	An open-source, elastic, and workload-aware cloud data warehouse designed to meet businesses' massive-scale analytics needs at low cost and with low complexity	NewSQL database with distributed OLTP and SQL
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Relational DBMS a hierachical model (tree) can be imposed	Relational DBMS	Document store Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.19 Rank #329   Overall #146   Relational DBMS	Score 0.34 Rank #283   Overall #130   Relational DBMS	Score 0.50 Rank #258   Overall #41   Document stores #120   Relational DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	bigobject.io	github.com/­datafuselabs/­databend www.databend.com	www.sequoiadb.com
Technical documentation		docs.bigobject.io	docs.databend.com	www.sequoiadb.com/­en/­index.php?m=Files&a=index
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	BigObject, Inc.	Databend Labs	Sequoiadb Ltd.
Initial release	2016	2015	2021	2013
Current release	1703		1.0.59, April 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free community edition available	Open Source Apache Version 2.0	Open Source Server: AGPL; Client: Apache V2
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java		Rust	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux distributed as a docker-image OS X distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker) Windows distributed as a docker-image (boot2docker)	hosted Linux macOS	Linux
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes oid, date, timestamp, binary, regex
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like DML and DDL statements	yes	SQL-like query language
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	fluentd ODBC RESTful HTTP API	CLI Client JDBC RESTful HTTP API	proprietary protocol using JSON
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings		Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python Rust	.Net C++ Java PHP Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	Lua	no	JavaScript
Triggers	yes	no	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	none	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	none	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	none	Immediate Consistency	Eventual Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	yes automatically between fact table and dimension tables	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	yes	Document is locked during a transaction
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes Read/write lock on objects (tables, trees)	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes		no
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	no	Users with fine-grained authorization concept, user roles	simple password-based access control
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	BigObject	Databend	Sequoiadb
Recent citations in the news	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News		Data Bending: Creating Unique Digital Visual Effects 23 April 2020, RedShark News Rust and the OS, the Web, Database and Other Languages 21 November 2022, The New Stack £1.1 Million in AddisonMckee Tube Bending Technologies Provides Dinex with Outstanding OEM Credentials 24 May 2007, news.thomasnet.com provided by Google News

Share this page