DBMS > AnzoGraph DB vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Blueflood vs. JSqlDb

System Properties Comparison AnzoGraph DB vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Blueflood vs. JSqlDb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	AnzoGraph DB  Xexclude from comparison	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Blueflood  Xexclude from comparison	JSqlDb  Xexclude from comparison
		This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.		JSqlDB seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Scalable graph database built for online analytics and data harmonization with MPP scaling, high-performance analytical algorithms and reasoning, and virtualization	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Scalable TimeSeries DBMS based on Cassandra	JavaScript Query Language Database, stores JavaScript objects and primitives
Primary database model	Graph DBMS RDF store	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Document store Object oriented DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 0.29 Rank #303   Overall #25   Graph DBMS #14   RDF stores		Score 0.13 Rank #346   Overall #33   Time Series DBMS
Website	cambridgesemantics.com/­anzograph	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	blueflood.io	jsqldb.org (offline)
Technical documentation	docs.cambridgesemantics.com/­anzograph/­userdoc/­home.htm		github.com/­rax-maas/­blueflood/­wiki
Developer	Cambridge Semantics	Atos Convergence Creators	Rackspace	Konrad von Backstrom
Initial release	2018	2016	2013	2018
Current release	2.3, January 2021	1703		0.8, December 2018
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial free trial version available	commercial	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language		Java	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux	Linux OS X	Linux macOS Windows
Data scheme	Schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	predefined scheme	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date		optional	yes	no
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	yes	no	no
Secondary indexes	no	yes	no	no
SQL Support of SQL	SPARQL and SPARQL* as primary query language. Cypher preview.	no	no	no
APIs and other access methods	Apache Mule gRPC JDBC Kafka OData access for BI tools OpenCypher RESTful HTTP API SPARQL	LDAP	HTTP REST
Supported programming languages	C++ Java Python	All languages with LDAP bindings		JavaScript
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	user defined functions and aggregates	no	no	functions in JavaScript
Triggers	no	yes	no	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Automatic sharding	Sharding cell division	Sharding based on Cassandra	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	Multi-source replication in MPP-Cluster	yes	selectable replication factor based on Cassandra	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	Kerberos/HDFS data loading		no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency in MPP-Cluster	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no not needed in graphs	no	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	ACID	Atomic execution of specific operations	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes using RocksDB
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes	no
User concepts Access control	Access rights for users and roles	LDAP bind authentication	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	AnzoGraph DB	Atos Standard Common Repository	Blueflood	JSqlDb
Recent citations in the news	AnzoGraph review: A graph database for deep analytics 15 April 2019, InfoWorld AnzoGraph: A W3C Standards-Based Graph Database | by Jo Stichbury 8 February 2019, Towards Data Science Cambridge Semantics Fits AnzoGraph DB with More Speed, Free Access 23 January 2020, Solutions Review Back to the future: Does graph database success hang on query language? 5 March 2018, ZDNet Comparing Graph Databases II. Part 2: ArangoDB, OrientDB, and… | by Sam Bell 20 September 2019, Towards Data Science provided by Google News	Infographic: What makes a Mobile Operator's setup future proof? 10 February 2024, Atos provided by Google News	Real-Time Performance and Health Monitoring Using Netdata 2 September 2019, CNX Software provided by Google News

Share this page