DBMS > AnzoGraph DB vs. ArcadeDB vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. SiteWhere

System Properties Comparison AnzoGraph DB vs. ArcadeDB vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. SiteWhere

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	AnzoGraph DB  Xexclude from comparison	ArcadeDB  Xexclude from comparison	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	SiteWhere  Xexclude from comparison
			This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Scalable graph database built for online analytics and data harmonization with MPP scaling, high-performance analytical algorithms and reasoning, and virtualization	Fast and scalable multi-model DBMS, originally forked from OrientDB but most of the code has been rewritten	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	M2M integration platform for persisting/querying time series data
Primary database model	Graph DBMS RDF store	Document store Graph DBMS Key-value store Time Series DBMS in next version	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 0.29 Rank #303   Overall #25   Graph DBMS #14   RDF stores	Score 0.10 Rank #358   Overall #48   Document stores #38   Graph DBMS #52   Key-value stores #35   Time Series DBMS		Score 0.06 Rank #383   Overall #43   Time Series DBMS
Website	cambridgesemantics.com/­anzograph	arcadedb.com	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	github.com/­sitewhere/­sitewhere
Technical documentation	docs.cambridgesemantics.com/­anzograph/­userdoc/­home.htm	docs.arcadedb.com		sitewhere1.sitewhere.io/­index.html
Developer	Cambridge Semantics	Arcade Data	Atos Convergence Creators	SiteWhere
Initial release	2018	2021	2016	2010
Current release	2.3, January 2021	September 2021	1703
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial free trial version available	Open Source Apache Version 2.0	commercial	Open Source Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language		Java	Java	Java
Server operating systems	Linux	All OS with a Java VM	Linux	Linux OS X Windows
Data scheme	Schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support	schema-free	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	predefined scheme
Typing predefined data types such as float or date		yes	optional	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	no	yes	no
Secondary indexes	no	yes	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	SPARQL and SPARQL* as primary query language. Cypher preview.	SQL-like query language, no joins	no	no
APIs and other access methods	Apache Mule gRPC JDBC Kafka OData access for BI tools OpenCypher RESTful HTTP API SPARQL	JDBC MongoDB API OpenCypher PostgreSQL wire protocol Redis API RESTful HTTP/JSON API TinkerPop Gremlin	LDAP	HTTP REST
Supported programming languages	C++ Java Python	Java	All languages with LDAP bindings
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	user defined functions and aggregates		no
Triggers	no		yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Automatic sharding		Sharding cell division	Sharding based on HBase
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	Multi-source replication in MPP-Cluster	Source-replica replication	yes	selectable replication factor based on HBase
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	Kerberos/HDFS data loading	no		no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency in MPP-Cluster	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no not needed in graphs	yes relationship in graphs	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	ACID	ACID	Atomic execution of specific operations	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		yes	no
User concepts Access control	Access rights for users and roles		LDAP bind authentication	Users with fine-grained authorization concept
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	AnzoGraph DB	ArcadeDB	Atos Standard Common Repository	SiteWhere
Recent citations in the news	AnzoGraph review: A graph database for deep analytics 15 April 2019, InfoWorld Cambridge Semantics Unveils AnzoGraph DB with Geospatial Analytics 19 June 2020, Solutions Review AnzoGraph: A W3C Standards-Based Graph Database | by Jo Stichbury 8 February 2019, Towards Data Science Cambridge Semantics Fits AnzoGraph DB with More Speed, Free Access 23 January 2020, Solutions Review Back to the future: Does graph database success hang on query language? 5 March 2018, ZDNet provided by Google News			SiteWhere: An open platform for connected devices 11 July 2017, Open Source For You 11 Best Open source IoT Platforms To Develop Smart Projects 9 March 2023, H2S Media provided by Google News

Share this page