DBMS > AlaSQL vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. IBM Db2 Event Store vs. ITTIA

System Properties Comparison AlaSQL vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. IBM Db2 Event Store vs. ITTIA

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

JavaScript DBMS library

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

Distributed Event Store optimized for Internet of Things use cases

Edge Time Series DBMS with Real-Time Stream Processing

Primary database model

Document store
Relational DBMS

Document store
Key-value store

Event Store
Time Series DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.51
Rank	#256	Overall
	#40	Document stores
	#118	Relational DBMS

Score	0.27
Rank	#309	Overall
	#2	Event Stores
	#28	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.44
Rank	#267	Overall
	#23	Time Series DBMS

Website

alasql.org

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.ibm.com/products/db2-event-store

www.ittia.com

Technical documentation

github.com/AlaSQL/alasql

www.ibm.com/docs/en/db2-event-store

Developer

Andrey Gershun & Mathias R. Wulff

Atos Convergence Creators

IBM

ITTIA L.L.C.

Initial release

2014

2016

2017

2007

Current release

1703

2.0

8.7

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

MIT-License

commercial

free developer edition available

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

JavaScript

Java

C and C++

Server operating systems

server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js)

Linux

Linux, macOS, Windows for the developer addition

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

Fixed schema

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

optional

yes

Float/Blob/Integer/String/Unicode/Date/Time/Timestamp/Interval

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Close to SQL99, but no user access control, stored procedures and host language bindings.

yes

through the embedded Spark runtime

yes

APIs and other access methods

JavaScript API

LDAP

ADO.NET
DB2 Connect
JDBC
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

JDBC
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API
WebSocket

Supported programming languages

JavaScript

All languages with LDAP bindings

C
C#
C++
Cobol
Delphi
Fortran
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Visual Basic

C
C++
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

cell division

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

yes

Active-active shard replication

yes

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

none

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Eventual Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

only for local storage and DOM-storage

Atomic execution of specific operations

yes

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

No - written data is immutable

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

by using IndexedDB, SQL.JS or proprietary FileStorage

yes

Yes - Synchronous writes to local disk combined with replication and asynchronous writes in parquet format to permanent shared storage

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP bind authentication

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Database file passwords

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Create a Marvel Database with SQL and Javascript, the easy way
2 July 2019, Towards Data Science

Multi faceted data exploration in the browser using Leaflet and amCharts
3 May 2020, Towards Data Science

provided by Google News

Advancements in streaming data storage, real-time analysis and machine learning
25 July 2019, ibm.com

How IBM Is Turning Db2 into an ‘AI Database’
3 June 2019, Datanami

Best cloud databases of 2022
4 October 2022, ITPro

Why a robust data management strategy is essential today | IBM HDM
19 September 2019, Express Computer

provided by Google News

Embedded secured data base for STM32 MCUs
16 October 2023, Electronics Weekly

ITTIA Embedded Time Series Database to Support STM32 Edge Devices
8 April 2022, Embedded Computing Design

Free Healthcare Data for Use with Maptitude 2019 Mapping Software - GIS user technology news
20 September 2019, GISuser.com

provided by Google News

Share this page