DBMS > 4D vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Galaxybase vs. Manticore Search

System Properties Comparison 4D vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Galaxybase vs. Manticore Search

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	4D former name: 4th Dimension  Xexclude from comparison	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Galaxybase  Xexclude from comparison	Manticore Search  Xexclude from comparison
		This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Application development environment with integrated database management system	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Scalable, ACID-compliant native distributed parallel graph platform	Multi-storage database for search, including full-text search.
Primary database model	Relational DBMS	Document store Key-value store	Graph DBMS	Search engine
Secondary database models				Time Series DBMS using the Manticore Columnar Library
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 2.47 Rank #110   Overall #54   Relational DBMS		Score 0.07 Rank #377   Overall #40   Graph DBMS	Score 0.29 Rank #302   Overall #21   Search engines
Website	www.4d.com	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	galaxybase.com	manticoresearch.com
Technical documentation	developer.4d.com			manual.manticoresearch.com
Developer	4D, Inc	Atos Convergence Creators	Chuanglin(Createlink) Technology Co., Ltd 浙江创邻科技有限公司	Manticore Software
Initial release	1984	2016	2017	2017
Current release	v20, April 2023	1703	Nov 20, November 2021	6.0, February 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	commercial	Open Source GPL version 2
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language		Java	C and Java	C++
Server operating systems	OS X Windows	Linux	Linux	FreeBSD Linux macOS Windows
Data scheme	yes	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	Strong typed schema	Fixed schema
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes	optional	yes	Int, Bigint, Float, Timestamp, Bit, Int array, Bigint array, JSON, Boolean
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	yes	no	Can index from XML
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes full-text index on all search fields
SQL Support of SQL	yes close to SQL 92	no	no	SQL-like query language
APIs and other access methods	ODBC RESTful HTTP API by using 4D Mobile SOAP webservices	LDAP	Browser interface console (shell) Graph API (Gremlin) OpenCypher Proprietary native API	Binary API RESTful HTTP/JSON API RESTful HTTP/SQL API SQL over MySQL
Supported programming languages	4D proprietary IDE PHP	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go Java Python	Elixir Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	yes	no	user defined procedures and functions	user defined functions
Triggers	yes	yes		no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	none	Sharding cell division	Sharding	Sharding Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	Multi-source replication	yes		Synchronous replication based on Galera library
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	no		no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	yes	no	yes Relationships in graphs	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	ACID	Atomic execution of specific operations	ACID	yes isolated transactions for atomic changes and binary logging for safe writes
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes The original contents of fields are not stored in the Manticore index.
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	no	yes	yes
User concepts Access control	Users and groups	LDAP bind authentication	Role-based access control	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	4D former name: 4th Dimension	Atos Standard Common Repository	Galaxybase	Manticore Search
DB-Engines blog posts	MySQL, PostgreSQL and Redis are the winners of the March ranking 2 March 2016, Paul Andlinger show all
Recent citations in the news				Integrating Manticore Search with Apache Superset 8 August 2023, hackernoon.com Clickhouse vs Elasticsearch vs Manticore Search Query Times With a 1.7B NYC Taxi Rides Benchmark 1 June 2022, hackernoon.com Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++ 25 July 2022, hackernoon.com 8 Google Alternatives: How to Search Crypto, the Dark Web, More 1 February 2023, Gizmodo Highlighting in Search Results 24 May 2020, hackernoon.com provided by Google News

Share this page