DBMS > 4D vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Firebolt vs. Google Cloud Datastore

System Properties Comparison 4D vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Firebolt vs. Google Cloud Datastore

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Application development environment with integrated database management system

Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks

Highly scalable cloud data warehouse and analytics product

Forked from Clickhouse

Automatically scaling NoSQL Database as a Service (DBaaS) on the Google Cloud Platform

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Document store
Key-value store

Relational DBMS

Document store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	2.37
Rank	#110	Overall
	#54	Relational DBMS

Score	1.49
Rank	#148	Overall
	#68	Relational DBMS

Score	4.13
Rank	#71	Overall
	#12	Document stores

Website

www.4d.com

atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository

www.firebolt.io

cloud.google.com/datastore

Technical documentation

developer.4d.com

docs.firebolt.io

cloud.google.com/datastore/docs

Developer

4D, Inc

Atos Convergence Creators

Firebolt Analytics Inc.

Google

Initial release

1984

2016

2020

2008

Current release

v20, April 2023

1703

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

OS X
Windows

Linux

hosted

Data scheme

yes

Schema and schema-less with LDAP views

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

optional

yes

yes, details here

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

close to SQL 92

yes

SQL-like query language (GQL)

APIs and other access methods

ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

by using 4D Mobile
SOAP webservices

LDAP

.Net
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

gRPC (using protocol buffers) API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

Supported programming languages

4D proprietary IDE
PHP

All languages with LDAP bindings

Go
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

.Net
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

using Google App Engine

Triggers

yes

Callbacks using the Google Apps Engine

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

cell division

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication

yes

depending on storage layer

Multi-source replication using Paxos

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

using Google Cloud Dataflow

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on type of query and configuration

Strong Consistency is default for entity lookups and queries within an Entity Group (but can instead be made eventually consistent). Other queries are always eventual consistent.

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

via ReferenceProperties or Ancestor paths

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

Serializable Isolation within Transactions, Read Committed outside of Transactions

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Users and groups

LDAP bind authentication

Access rights for users, groups and roles based on Google Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM)

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MySQL, PostgreSQL and Redis are the winners of the March ranking
2 March 2016, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

Firebolt Introduces Industry-First Low Latency Cloud Data Warehouse
18 September 2024, insideainews.com

Data warehouse unicorn Firebolt aims to make magic in Kirkland
11 September 2024, The Business Journals

Analytics and Data Science News for the Week of September 20; Updates from Firebolt, Qrvey, Teradata & More
20 September 2024, Solutions Review

10 Best Data Pipeline Tools of 2024 to Boost Your Productivity
20 February 2024, Datamation

Firebolt Archives - High-Performance Computing News Analysis
17 September 2024, insideHPC

provided by Google News

What Is Google Cloud? Platform, Benefits & More Explained
11 September 2024, Cloudwards

Google Gets Rid of Fees To Transfer Data Out of Cloud Platform
12 January 2024, Spiceworks News and Insights

Best cloud storage of 2024
13 September 2024, TechRadar

17 Top Cloud Storage Companies to Know
9 April 2024, Built In

Google says it’ll stop charging fees to transfer data out of Google Cloud
11 January 2024, TechCrunch

provided by Google News

Share this page